Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
Movies
Byrne Robotics > Movies Page of 8 Next >>
Topic: ALIEN 3 and the mess it left behind (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Sam Karns
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 December 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 7572
Posted: 17 September 2007 at 1:09pm | IP Logged | 1  

I was reading some of your thoughts on the new Alien franchise and some like the first film and some thought it was not that good.  Although I think all of the Alien films looked quite intriguing, the later tales, after James Cameron's Aliens, were quite horrible in my opinion.  In the latest Aliens dvd James Cameron mentioned several times in his commentary --through subtext--of how much  he doesn't like the film and hated how easy it was to kill off his characters.  Joss Whedon loathed the third one; he also made some comments that the folks at 20th Century Fox were embarrassed by it and regreted killing Ripley.  What are your opinions of Alien 3 and is it true that it was this film that ruined the franchise?  What was wrong about it that so many fans try not to mentioned its title because it may start a huge argument? 

Edited by Sam Karns on 17 September 2007 at 1:11pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Imaginary X-Man

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 117336
Posted: 17 September 2007 at 1:53pm | IP Logged | 2  

ALIENS 3 is everything that's wrong about Hollywood, from an incorrect title (it's ALIENS 2) to allowing the real world to affect the plot. (Ripley's saving of Newt is neutered because the actor who played Newt is too old to reprise her roll. Right. Because ALIENS took place 29 second after ALIEN, so ALIENS 3. . . )

I was disappointed with everyone who worked on ALIENS 3.

ALIEN - RESURRECTION I thought was not so bad, on its own, but that might be largely because of two things: I did not find it as bad as 3, and the swimming Aliens were a whole new kind of creepy. The ending sucked (literally!) tho.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 33226
Posted: 17 September 2007 at 2:11pm | IP Logged | 3  

If you ever get a chance, the feature length "making of" doc on the ALIEN QUADRILOGY set for ALIENS 3 is a fascinating watch. It details, often excruciatingly, the battle between studio, director, screenwriter, and franchise.  It's a must see for any fan of behind-the-scenes Hollywood filmmaking.
Back to Top profile | search
 
George Peter Gatsis
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 September 2004
Posts: 2130
Posted: 17 September 2007 at 2:20pm | IP Logged | 4  

 is it true that it was this film that ruined the franchise?
 -  -  -  -  -  -  -
The Aliens are still going in AvP and upcoming AvP 2...
other examples:
((Batman is still going in Begins and Dark Knight...
Superman is still going in Returns and upcoming...
Star Trek... etc... etc...))

I don't think it is RUINED... more like stalled for a time... and given hollywood, nothing is really ruined just revamped, regardless of the history...

Besides... there was some nice stuff in 3 and 4 that made it fun to watch...

Only thing that bugged me was the credit to Giger (forgive spelling) was missing in 3 or 4... don't remember which...
Back to Top profile | search
 
Steven McCauley
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 23 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1421
Posted: 17 September 2007 at 2:23pm | IP Logged | 5  

Alien 3 felt to me like someone had a story of a "monster in a penal colony" horror movie already written and they shoe-horned it into the Aliens franchise.

Real downer of an ending -- I saw it opening night and I remember the audience with confused looks on their faces walking out.

One thing I did like about it was the concept that the alien takes on the form of the organism it infects.  The only aliens we'd seen to this point were bipedal since only humans had been infected. 

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
George Peter Gatsis
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 September 2004
Posts: 2130
Posted: 17 September 2007 at 2:27pm | IP Logged | 6  

One thing I did like about it was the concept that the alien takes on the form of the organism it infects.

 - -  - -  - -  - -  - -  - -

Now THAT was cool!!!
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Imaginary X-Man

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 117336
Posted: 17 September 2007 at 2:30pm | IP Logged | 7  

One thing I did like about it was the concept that the alien takes on the form of the organism it infects.

I played with that in ALIENS - EARTH ANGEL, without having seen ALIENS 3 at that point. I was inspired by Geiger's use of a real human skull as the "face" of the alien in the original movie.

Back to Top profile | search
 
George Peter Gatsis
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 September 2004
Posts: 2130
Posted: 17 September 2007 at 2:51pm | IP Logged | 8  

Aliens Earth Angel fits nicely into the AvP Movie Earth storyline...
Back to Top profile | search
 
Aaron Smith
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 September 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 10463
Posted: 17 September 2007 at 3:15pm | IP Logged | 9  

JB, I had no idea you had ever done an ALIENS comic. I'll have to see if I can find that.
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Christopher Alan Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 October 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2787
Posted: 17 September 2007 at 3:36pm | IP Logged | 10  

There's also the fact that none of the three survivors of Aliens could possibly have been carrying an alien inside of them. Apparently someone must've beamed one aboard.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Tony Meusel
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 31 August 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 56
Posted: 17 September 2007 at 3:48pm | IP Logged | 11  

ALIENS 3 is everything that's wrong about Hollywood, from an incorrect title (it's ALIENS 2)

************************************************************ *********************************

Back to Top profile | search
 
Kevin Hanson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 09 August 2007
Posts: 23
Posted: 17 September 2007 at 3:58pm | IP Logged | 12  

ALIENS 3 is everything that's wrong about Hollywood, from an incorrect title (it's ALIENS 2)

+++++++++++++++++++++

Actually (!!!) it's Alien 3. No 'S'.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103644/

So would that make it technically Alien 2 since Aliens was called Aliens? Or is it Aliens 2 because it's a sequel to Aliens? Or is it just plain old Alien 3 since it is the 3rd movie in the series.

The wife and I were talking about this the other day, as we caught a few minutes of Alien: Resurrection whilst channel surfing.

Truthfully there didn't NEED to be anything beyond Alien. It's a classic that still give me the creeps every thime I  watch it.

However, the Action and adventure in Aliens was really cool at the time. It still stands up all these years later. As a different KIND of movie than the original, I think it deserves it's place in sci-fi/action movie history.

BUT that's where it should have stopped. Alien 3, and Ressurrection were just too much it IS a prime example of  Hollywood seeing the potential for more $$$ and milking the idea. Unfortunately, what we got, didn't satisfy.

 

edited to add.

Yeah, count me in on finding a copy of that comic as well.

I didn't know you did one either!

edited again well because I can't get it to make the 3 the correct way. Its the small 3 as in "Cubed"  but if you look at the link you'll see.



Edited by Kevin Hanson on 17 September 2007 at 4:07pm
Back to Top profile | search
 

Page of 8 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login