Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 7 Next >>
Topic: Russia invades Georgia (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Michael Retour
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 932
Posted: 09 August 2008 at 8:20am | IP Logged | 1  

"How did all of those tanks get passed homeland security?"

LOL.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Ray Brady
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3740
Posted: 09 August 2008 at 8:46am | IP Logged | 2  

Oh Criminy. How many Americans now believe that Russia just invaded the
southern United States?
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Michael Retour
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 932
Posted: 09 August 2008 at 8:52am | IP Logged | 3  

Ray that reminds of of the spot Jay Leno does where he asks Americans questions and quite a few of them don't have the answer!


Back to Top profile | search
 
Chris Durnell
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 February 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 1235
Posted: 10 August 2008 at 12:12am | IP Logged | 4  

The fog of war is making it hard to understand exactly what is going on, but no doubt we'll know in a few days how well the initial Russian assault went.  Below are bullet points of pertinent information.

  • Russia has not responded to Georgia's pleas for a cease fire and international mediation.  Putin has left Beijing and is now in North Ossetia next to the border with Georgia.
  • Fighting continues in Tskhinvali.  Russia claims it has control, but there's evidence that Georgia has either retaken the town or is attempting to.  Tskhinvali occupies a strategically important spot and if held, could prevent any further Russian advance into Georgia.
  • It is assumed Russia intends to take Tskhinvali and then continue south to cut Georgia in two.  Word is that Russia may not drive on the Georgian capital Tblisi because it might provoke a Western response - remember that Russia's excuse is to protect the South Ossetians from Georgia.
  • Abkhazia, another breakaway region in Georgia, has asked UN observers to leave and have attacked Georgian troops in the Kodori Gorge.  If successful, they could attempt to seize Georgia's ports and cut off Georgia's access to the world.
  • The Russian Black Sea Fleet has sent ships to blockade Georgia's ports.
  • Reports indicate Russia is assembling more troops - elite paratroopers and Spetnatz special forces included.
  • The Baltic states and Poland (all NATO members) have issued a joint statement condemning the Russia invasion.  Poland has offered any help Georgia may ask.  Poland's President, Lech Kaczynski, has stated, "We are not planning to send any troops there, but anything is possible."
  • Georgia's 2000 troops in Iraq will be heading back to Georgia ASAP.

It is too early to determine how things will happen.  Russia will have the advantage in numbers, but Georgian troops are considered to be highly trained compared to regular Russian conscript troops (not necessarily any elite Russian forces).  They also have the advantage in supply lines, terrain, and knowing the territory.

In the short term, a Russian victory is not assured.  In the long run, Russia has lots more resources to pour into the fight even if the Georgians inittially win.  Much depends on how much diplomatic and other pressure is applied to Russia, and whether Russia can accept anything other than a decisive win.  Much of Putin's domestic support comes from the view that he has made Russia strong again.  Any semblance of defeat would likely cause a collapse of support for him.  I don't think he will tolerate any loss.  If Russia does not win quick, how much will he escalate the crisis?

Links for those who want to know more.

View from the New York Post

Current analysis as of August 9

Back to Top profile | search
 
Knut Robert Knutsen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2006
Posts: 7374
Posted: 10 August 2008 at 1:39am | IP Logged | 5  

Negotiations for a cease-fire while fighting over a disputed piece of territory are tricky. Georgia will want a cease-fire while they still maintain military control over parts of South Ossetia. Once Russia has driven all Georgian troops out of South Ossetia, they might be open to a cease-fire.

The problem is that South Ossetia has broken away from Georgia and by all accounts that's a majority decision. It's not Russia going in, saying they want the land. That might be their long-term plan, but right now, they're just standing up for a small country that has claimed independence.

The Baltic states are probably shaking in their boots, since the Russian minority in these countries are deeply mistrusted and in some cases even hated. If Russia starts using the "protecting Russians abroad" argument, they will have legitimate concerns.

There's a lot of bad blood left over from the Soviet Union and its collapse, and if that gets to be the driving force this could get really ugly. It all depends what game plan Putin is choosing.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12857
Posted: 10 August 2008 at 1:59am | IP Logged | 6  

In my opinion

- Putin's government are brutal bullies. They've committed all sorts of atrocities against the Muslim Chechen population over the years, which the Western press has largely ignored.

- The Georgian government are themselves bullies. If they have a right to pursue their own political future separate from Russia, why don't the Ossettians have the same right to walk away from Georgia?

In any case, the innocent and powerless folk on all sides will suffer and die.


Edited by Joe Zhang on 10 August 2008 at 2:02am
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Christopher Alan Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 October 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2787
Posted: 10 August 2008 at 2:13am | IP Logged | 7  

I'm not sure what the Georgian government thought they were going to gain. They must've gotten some very bad intelligence suggesting that Russian wouldn't react. If anything the Russians were tipped off and ready to respond judging from the speed of their reaction. NATO won't touch Georgia with a ten foot pole now.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Retour
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 932
Posted: 10 August 2008 at 10:19am | IP Logged | 8  

Perhaps Georgia was encouraged? 

I had read that Russia knew this was coming and was prepared to respond.

CBS is reporting Georgia has already declared a ceasefire.  It is also reporting Russian jets are bombing Georgia.  The West can do nothing.  Poland's protest amounts to me protesting.  Is Bush going to attack Russia?  Hardly. 

Personally I believe that the certain powers in the West would like nothing better than to break up Russia and China into small, weak powers and this "little adventure" is part of that. 
Back to Top profile | search
 
Knut Robert Knutsen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2006
Posts: 7374
Posted: 10 August 2008 at 10:35am | IP Logged | 9  

The reports we get over here is that Georgia is asking for a ceasefire, Russia demands they withdraw from South Ossetia first, they say they're out, Russians and South Ossetians say they're not, the Georgians admit that no, they're not really out, but they're out enough.

Et cetera, et cetera.

South Ossetia declared itself independent aalmost 20 years ago and has already had 2 referendums on this, all perfectly democratic and on the up and up. They want to be reunited with North Ossetia, which is across the Russian border.

If anybody wants to paint Russia as the bad guy, I think they've picked the wrong conflict, because every move Russia has made has been covered by "we're helping our peacekeepers, we're supporting a democratic bid for independence" et cetera.

Not saying they're the good guy, but so far their ass seems to be well and truly covered.

Back to Top profile | search
 
David Ferguson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 March 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 6782
Posted: 10 August 2008 at 12:56pm | IP Logged | 10  

They might be in the right to a certain extent, Knut, but they're going about it the wrong way. I saw an image of a Georgian woman weeping with blood on her face on the front cover of a British newspaper with the headline "Barbaric". It was exactly that.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Chris Durnell
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 February 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 1235
Posted: 10 August 2008 at 2:09pm | IP Logged | 11  

The question of who has a right to secede from a country and be accepted by the international community is one that causes headaches to foreign ministries.  Regardless of whatever moral right a group of people may have, there are legal steps involved and very few independence movements qualify for them.

In regards to Georgia's right to secede, well all of the Soviet Republics were guaranteed a legal right to secede from the USSR (of course, this was a farce in reality).  When the Soviet Union dissolved, Georgia and all other Soviet Republics became legally sovereign.  Therefore, there was no issue concerning the legality of Georgian independence.

As for South Ossetia, one can be symapthetic to their concerns.  However since the Rose Revolution, Georgia has offered South Ossetia (and Abkhazia) a great deal of self-autonomy.  Also, any vote on the issue is quite dubious.  It certainly didn't include any of the Georgians displaced by the original fighting.  And how honest an assessment can you get in that situation?  There is a pro-Georgian government in South Ossetia at the same there is a breakaway government.  It muddies the waters enough.  Are you going to allow just anyone to decide they don't need to follow the law?  No international government, not even Russia, has recognized South Ossetia or Abkhazia.

No doubt President Saakashvili gambled when he attempted to regain control over South Ossetia.  He's a political gambler, but he pulled it off when he restored some semblance of democracy during the Rose Revolution and reasserting control over Adjara.  I don't think there was anything wrong with attempting to do the same in South Ossetia, it's just this time Russia decided to send in tanks.  It may have been a mistake in power politics, but that does not make it legally or morally wrong.

Russia is clearly the wrong party here.  It has been provoking conflicts and attempting to undermine the sovereignty of many countries in its "near abroad" in the past two years.  Not just Georgia, but the Baltic states and even Ukraine.  It is clearly a policy of Moscow that it cannot accept any true democracy in the former Soviet Union.  It wants people it can command, and preferably corrupt thugs it can do business with.  In the past few months alone, Russia has shut down Georgian UAVs, dropped bombs, and did other violations of Georgia.  It has a clear history of trying to provoke Georgia, no doubt in order to have an excuse to invade like it is now.  If Georgia hadn't attempted to reassert control in South Ossetia, I believe Russia would eventually have found a reason to invade anyway.  I think people looking to put the blame on Georgia are taking a very narrow view on the matter.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Carmen Bernardo
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 August 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 3666
Posted: 10 August 2008 at 3:05pm | IP Logged | 12  

   Last time I looked, headlines and tickers are saying that the Russians have taken out a Georgian ship and the Pope is calling for a ceasefire and negotiations.  That latter part would be funny, if it weren't so damned serious (this being a war, and all).  The best I can figure for the Pope is that he's obligated to say things like this.  It's not as if the Russians and Georgians (neither Catholic nor possibly even believing in God -- there being atheists in charge in some places) would pay attention, the threats of excommunication and such no longer bearing the weight they once used to (not my God, or there is no "God", means no consequences like being struck by ligthning, finding your soul burning in a molten lake, etc).

   Still, I'd keep my eye on the situation and remember that Russia is still Russia, remembering its history and everything which came with it.  Putin hasn't made it a secret what he thinks ought to happen under his watch.  At worst, this is the opening salvo for a greater push for Russia to rebuild its old empire, which it currently focusing on troublesome smaller neighbors but may escalate to include larger countries like the Ukraine.

   My question is what would happen if this spills over into Central Asia.  The Afghans have to be aware of this, knowing what happened no less than 20 years ago...

Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 7 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login