Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 15 Next >>
Topic: Renewed copyright issue for Marvel (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Knut Robert Knutsen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2006
Posts: 7374
Posted: 21 September 2009 at 6:20am | IP Logged | 1  

Does anyone know what characters they're supposed to be seeking copyright termination for?  Because I keep hearing lots of wild speculation and no facts on what time period and what chracters we're talking about. With very few exceptions, Kirby's work until 1970 was done with either Joe Simon or Stan Lee and I haven't heard anything about how this affects them.  

Back to Top profile | search
 
Kevin Brown
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 31 May 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 8841
Posted: 21 September 2009 at 6:55am | IP Logged | 2  

Knut, pretrty much the entire Marvel Universe up until 1970 was co-created by Jack Kirby.  Not all, but a very large, highly recognizable chunk of it.  Spider-Man, Fantastic Four, Hulk, Thor, Captain America, Iron Man...  Kirby had his hand in designing or outright creating the characters.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Peter Martin
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 March 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 15778
Posted: 21 September 2009 at 7:16am | IP Logged | 3  

Spider-Man? I know he had an initial go at the design, but am I wrong in thinking that Spidey is 100% Ditko and Lee?

edited to add: for clarity, when I say 'he had an initial go', I mean Kirby.



Edited by Peter Martin on 21 September 2009 at 7:17am
Back to Top profile | search
 
Steve De Young
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 April 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 3488
Posted: 21 September 2009 at 7:25am | IP Logged | 4  

I think it's in the rights of Kirby's children to try to gain a share of the copyrights.

-----------------------------------------------------

I know this is revisiting a past discussion, but how does anyone have a 'right' to the product of another person's labor?


Back to Top profile | search
 
Adam Hutchinson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 December 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 4502
Posted: 21 September 2009 at 7:46am | IP Logged | 5  

I would guess because the "the products of his labor" are considered part of his estate, which is past on to his heirs.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Steve De Young
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 April 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 3488
Posted: 21 September 2009 at 7:56am | IP Logged | 6  

I would guess because the "the products of his labor" are considered part of his estate, which is past on to his heirs.

---------------------------------------------------

Estate rights are the right of Kirby to pass on what he owns to his heirs (as designated by him) in so far as he chooses to.  The rights were Jack's.  Heirs don't have the right, at least in the U.S., to claim pieces of their parents' estates against their parents' wishes.

And of course, this is material which Kirby himself didn't even own, that they're trying to claim on his behalf.

Rewarding people who have done nothing for things that their biological forebears accomplished does nothing to help our society.  See Paris Hilton.


Back to Top profile | search
 
Knut Robert Knutsen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2006
Posts: 7374
Posted: 21 September 2009 at 8:32am | IP Logged | 7  

"Knut, pretrty much the entire Marvel Universe up until 1970 was co-created by Jack Kirby. "

I know what Kirby did. But they're not claiming overship over half the pre 1970 Marvel Universe, are they? Lots of those characters, including Spider-Man, are characters that Kirby doesn't even have bragging rights to.

There has to be specific claims to specific characters that is then backed up with evidence.  Some of the reports say that the Kirby estate served notice on Sony who only have rights to Spider-Man and Ghost Rider.  If they're laying claim to Spider-Man or Ghost Rider, then how is this not frivolous or ill considered?

We should know which characters are involved. If they've served 45 legal notices they must have a list of characters that they're claiming. At least a provisional list.   

Back to Top profile | search
 
Anthony Frail
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 09 October 2007
Posts: 960
Posted: 21 September 2009 at 8:33am | IP Logged | 8  


 QUOTE:
I know this is revisiting a past discussion, but how does anyone have a 'right' to the product of another person's labor?

By being the family of the person. Tha'ts how people usually get their inheritance.

I imagien Jack would love for his heirs to receive profit from his work. That was the whole point of him trying to regain his original artwork.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 July 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 30886
Posted: 21 September 2009 at 8:35am | IP Logged | 9  

Well, if his heirs do get some sort of copyright ownership out of this, I do hope Stan gets half.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Steve De Young
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 April 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 3488
Posted: 21 September 2009 at 8:57am | IP Logged | 10  

I imagien Jack would love for his heirs to receive profit from his work.

------------------------------------

You imagine, but you don't know.  And you don't get inheritance by being biologically related.  You get inheritance by someone deciding to leave something to you when you pass on.  Maybe Jack didn't like some of his heirs.  Maybe he would want one to get everything, and/or some to get nothing.  The inheritance rights belonged to Jack.  He had the right to pass on his possessions to his heirs (again, as designated by him, not by biology).  His heirs have no 'right' to anything.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Adam Hutchinson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 December 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 4502
Posted: 21 September 2009 at 9:16am | IP Logged | 11  

True, but to be fair do you know that he didn't want them to have the benefits of his creations?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Knut Robert Knutsen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2006
Posts: 7374
Posted: 21 September 2009 at 10:05am | IP Logged | 12  

"I do hope Stan gets half."

There is no conceivable situation whereby Stan Lee can reclaim any copyright to anything he ever created for Marvel. He was an actual employee of Marvel, mostly as an editor, since he was about 17 years old. None of the work he did in those years could possibly fall outside a work-for-hire situation.  The sole possible exception being his Willie Lumpkin strip with Dan DeCarlo (or was it Stan Goldberg).  But even then, by bringing Willie Lumpkin into the Marvel Universe himself, he cannot in good faith prevent Marvel from using him (at least in reprints).

Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 15 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login