Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
Star Trek
Byrne Robotics > Star Trek << Prev Page of 60
Topic: More Star Trek Models from Round 2 Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Greg Kirkman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 14935
Posted: 02 June 2018 at 10:13pm | IP Logged | 1 post reply

What does it say that the titular starship of DISCOVERY isn’t one of the options? That’s pretty weird.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Greg Kirkman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 14935
Posted: 03 June 2018 at 10:45am | IP Logged | 2 post reply

...okay, I looked into the Wonderfest news, and Discovery is one of the options. Not that I care.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Busy Doing Nothing!

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 111063
Posted: 03 June 2018 at 11:35am | IP Logged | 3 post reply

All these models serve only to remind me that every change to the original design has made it more, well, designy and less practical.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Ron Goad
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 March 2015
Location: United States
Posts: 54
Posted: 03 June 2018 at 10:13pm | IP Logged | 4 post reply

^ That's been the issue with a lot of sci fi that's been around for years.

Any "update" seems to drag a solid design down to the same level as lesser work that came after it...
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Busy Doing Nothing!

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 111063
Posted: 04 June 2018 at 6:01am | IP Logged | 5 post reply

It struck me several years back that each new design seemed predicated upon making less breakable toys. (Until Jar Jar stepped in, and gave us an "Enterprise" even MORE fragile than the original!)
Back to Top profile | search
 
Joe Boster
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 29 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3108
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 12:36pm | IP Logged | 6 post reply

Somehow I missed the K'Tinga announcement!  Why would people want 1:!400? Just cost?  It would be kind of interesting to get the new funky enterprise.  It's funny all the people that say the  ship looks right in STD, the mock up pictures reall show how far off it really is. If this had be the Jar Jar-prise I would have been a lot happier with the movie. 

frm the commnets section for the DIscovery announcement: "Given the accepted size of the TOS-E of 289 m, the Discovery Enterprise is approximately 66% bigger." Yep sound like canon to me! 


Edited by Joe Boster on 14 June 2018 at 1:09pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Greg Kirkman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 14935
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 3:52pm | IP Logged | 7 post reply

I think that the relatively small size (at least compared to STD and JJTREK) of the TOS Enterprise is a big point in its favor.

The ship being about the size of an aircraft carrier gives a better sense of scale and relatability than the monster ships of later iterations.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Busy Doing Nothing!

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 111063
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 9:23pm | IP Logged | 8 post reply

Y'know, now that I think about it, I cannot recall a single TOS shot that gave a clear sense of the SIZE of the ship. BIG was about all we got!
Back to Top profile | search
 
Greg Kirkman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 14935
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 10:05pm | IP Logged | 9 post reply

About the only scale references I can think of would be the Bridge zoom-in shot from “The Cage”, and those occasions when we saw the windows from inside the ship (such as the hangar deck observation corridor in “The Conscience of The King”). Seeing the windows on the exterior would then give an impression of scale, which was the whole point, since Jefferies’ design was original windowless. Roddenberry wanted them added to give that quick sense of scale.

There’s also Sulu’s description of the buoy-cube’s dimensions in “The Corbomite Maneuver” (with each side of the cube being 107 meters), but the exterior shots of the cube next to the Enterprise make it look way too small...or maybe they just make the Enterprise look too HUGE!


I have a feeling those helpful illustrations in THE MAKING OF STAR TREK did a good job of making the ship’s size very clear to all of those early fans of the show! Of course, to this very day, flame wars rage across the World Wide Web regarding whether or not Jefferies’ 947’ ship actually meshes properly with the interior sets and the VFX models. This is the point where one needs to step back and remember that crossing every “t” and dotting every “i” on the ship’s blueprints was not Jefferies’ primary job concern!


Edited by Greg Kirkman on 14 June 2018 at 10:06pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Busy Doing Nothing!

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 111063
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 10:16pm | IP Logged | 10 post reply

That zoom shot is pretty much worthless as an indicator of scale. I tried fitting my Bridge model to my the shot (with the elevator way out of alignment) and it didn't match at all.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Greg Kirkman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 14935
Posted: 15 June 2018 at 1:08am | IP Logged | 11 post reply

As a rough indicator, I think it did the job well enough. We know how big the Bridge interior is, since the show spent so much time there. It was about 30’ in diameter. The exterior Bridge dome seen on the VFX model was very easy detail to spot at first glance, and was presumably supposed to be around the same size as the interior set (with accommodations for mechanics and whatnot).

As the story goes, Roddenberry wanted the Bridge on top of the ship as a quick and easy scale reference, which is why the pilot opened with that zoom-in shot. It immediately shows where the Bridge is located, and gives a rough sense of the ship’s overall size, assuming that exterior dome was around 30-40’ in diameter.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Greg Kirkman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 14935
Posted: 15 June 2018 at 1:11am | IP Logged | 12 post reply

By the way, here’s a very interesting thread from Enterprise expert David Shaw, discussing the evolution of the ship’s design. The topic of the Bridge and its relationship with the ship’s theoretical scale begins on page three.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

<< Prev Page of 60
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login