Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 18 Next >>
Topic: Milo Manara Draws Spider-Woman Fanboys Cry Foul (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Jason Czeskleba
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 April 2004
Posts: 4548
Posted: 21 August 2014 at 1:00am | IP Logged | 1  


 QUOTE:
If you don't like it, that's fine, but it's not offensive.
 If you don't like Superhuman people wearing skintight clothes doing athletic things, and artists taking that into account on the page, then maybe Superhero comics are not for you.


The quality of the composition is not really relevant to this discussion.  People are not protesting this because it is poorly-rendered.

Whether it's offensive or not is an opinion, not a fact.

I don't find it offensive so much as inappropriate for the publication/character, and sexist.  I find it hard to believe you can't see the distinction between an athletic pose and a sexualized one, or between how men and women are portrayed in comics in general.

Here's an illustration that makes the point nicely:
 
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132232
Posted: 21 August 2014 at 3:34am | IP Logged | 2  

Slow news week?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Paul Greer
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar

Joined: 18 August 2004
Posts: 14186
Posted: 21 August 2014 at 4:08am | IP Logged | 3  

I find it amusing we start this thread by attacking anyone who may not
like this image. Personally I like my porn to be of real women in live
action movies, not drawings of them in comic books. But to each their
own.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Carmen Bernardo
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 August 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 3666
Posted: 21 August 2014 at 4:50am | IP Logged | 4  

   One of the most amusing(?) things about this is that people are taking the bait. As much as I appreciate the technical aspects of Manara's artwork, I'm really not into the types of stories that he draws so I know what to expect of him when an announcement is made of his doing a variant Spider-Woman cover. Given what I recall of the original Spider-Woman comic which ran during my childhood years, there was a lot of what Japanese animation fans would call "fan service" scenes even then. Usually, those scenes were quite subtle given the nature of the Comics Code that was still in force then.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Eric Sofer
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 31 January 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 4789
Posted: 21 August 2014 at 5:16am | IP Logged | 5  

Well, the figure looks realistic anatomically speaking, if not a typical example (as opposed to that picture of Power Girl - oh merde!) It doesn't offend me, but there is no question in my mind that sex sells, and that's what's offered here.

But practically speaking... why would someone be in that position? If I were climbing a wall and going over to the roof, I would not put my tuchus in the air like a target in a shooting range. Then again, I'm not a young sexy woman who's forty-something... no, wait, Marvel time is seven years in the past? So she's only 28... nah. That way lies madness.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132232
Posted: 21 August 2014 at 5:33am | IP Logged | 6  

But practically speaking... why would someone be in that position? If I were climbing a wall and going over to the roof, I would not put my tuchus in the air like a target in a shooting range.

••

As to that. . .

The key to drawing superheroes in action -- and something which seems to elude many current artists -- is NOT to put them in relaxed or naturalistic positions. These shots are "freeze frames" that capture the action at the most extreme point. Poses that no human body would be likely to hold for more than a second or less,

So, sure, it's not likely that Spider-Woman would stick her bum up in the air and HOLD it there -- especially without an audience! -- but she might very well pass thru that position just for a moment.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Doug Centers
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 February 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 5458
Posted: 21 August 2014 at 5:40am | IP Logged | 7  

" but there is no question in my mind that sex sells, and that's what's offered here."

...

Bingo!
Back to Top profile | search
 
Kevin Brown
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 31 May 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 8841
Posted: 21 August 2014 at 6:07am | IP Logged | 8  

Jeez!  I'm reading the thread and then I scroll down to that image that Brian Peck posts.   Of course, someone walks up behind me at work right at that point!

A little warning please!
Back to Top profile | search
 
Roy Johnson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 May 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 1323
Posted: 21 August 2014 at 6:10am | IP Logged | 9  


 QUOTE:
Well, the figure looks realistic anatomically speaking, if not a typical example (as opposed to that picture of Power Girl - oh merde!)

Eric, can you expand on that, I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. Are you saying the Power Girl is not realistic anatomically, or that its not typical? She looks proportioned correctly to me (unlike, say, a Michael Turner drawing as below -- Kryptonians sure have weird spines).

Back to Top profile | search
 
Anthony J Lombardi
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 January 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 9410
Posted: 21 August 2014 at 6:11am | IP Logged | 10  

As to that. . .

The key to drawing superheroes in action -- and something which seems to elude many current artists -- is NOT to put them in relaxed or naturalistic positions. These shots are "freeze frames" that capture the action at the most extreme point. Poses that no human body would be likely to hold for more than a second or less,

So, sure, it's not likely that Spider-Woman would stick her bum up in the air and HOLD it there -- especially without an audience! -- but she might very well pass thru that position just for a moment.

`````````````````

That's has been a point of frustration for me for quite sometime now. No matter how I've tried to explain that point. Too many would be "art experts" just can't grasp the concept.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Anthony J Lombardi
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 January 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 9410
Posted: 21 August 2014 at 6:13am | IP Logged | 11  

Back tho the first post.  I don't think it's sexist. I don't like it myself.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 35722
Posted: 21 August 2014 at 8:00am | IP Logged | 12  

 Brian Peck wrote:
Big difference between the PowerGirl pose and the Spider-Woman. The 
later is a pose that looks like it was in a Porn Magazine.

Both are extreme sexualizations of women, Brian. That was my point. 
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 18 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login