What's missing here, of course, are a number of things, not the least of which being that it is most often the large pieces that come under this kind of commentary, and the self-appointed "reviewer" is clearly not taking into account that a LARGE piece of art has been much reduced for reproduction in this Forum. (It's the same principle as comicbook publishing -- draw larger than the published page, so that the work will appear more "dense" on the finished page. Also, smooths up the lines.)

For some time I have wondered if there was some way to express their error to these knuckleheads. And one way did occur to me. So, this morning I took a 20x30 commission piece from the Gallery -- one that had been praised as so much better than my usual dross -- and "converted" it into equivalent comicbook pages. To do this I turned it sideways and added random "panel borders."

Add some "speech balloons" and "captions" and those "pages" look like any of my superhero work, right? Here's a couple of random pages from TRIPLE HELIX for comparison:

I guess it's true. Size matters.

Or since the previous commission, when the SAME THING was said!

It's the old "His old stuff was better." Even tho we do not see that phrase as often as was once the case, it seems permanently embedded in the chickpeas some of these people have for brains. (My favorite example of which was a few years back when I found a comment praising a recent commission piece as "See, this was back when Byrne was good!" The next poster pointed out that the commission was only a few months old, but there was no further response from the first guy.)

••

Of course not! These folk are afraid to change their minds. They think it hurts.