Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 44 Next >>
Topic: Spider-Man - presented without comment (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Trevor Thompson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 13 June 2015
Posts: 330
Posted: 30 June 2015 at 12:56pm | IP Logged | 1  

I hope you don't mind as this is slightly off topic but I wonder why Stan, et al had Peter Parker invent web shooters instead of him being able to produce webs organically? I might be answering my own question, here, but I wonder if it was only just to show he is a genius? 
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jason Larouse
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 2011
Posts: 515
Posted: 30 June 2015 at 1:04pm | IP Logged | 2  

I hope you don't mind as this is slightly off topic but I wonder why Stan, et al had Peter Parker invent web shooters instead of him being able to produce webs organically? I might be answering my own question, here, but I wonder if it was only just to show he is a genius? 
------

IMO Spider-Man is unique in that his super powers are only half of what makes him a hero, the other half is his brain. He's a hybrid of the Batman no power archetype and the traditional super hero archetype. 
Back to Top profile | search
 
Charles Valderrama
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4182
Posted: 30 June 2015 at 1:05pm | IP Logged | 3  

So, basically, Marvel turned Peter Parker into Tony Stark?

-C!
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Imaginary X-Man

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 122055
Posted: 30 June 2015 at 1:05pm | IP Logged | 4  

I hope you don't mind as this is slightly off topic but I wonder why Stan, et al had Peter Parker invent web shooters instead of him being able to produce webs organically? I might be answering my own question, here, but I wonder if it was only just to show he is a genius?

A whole raft of problems are unleashed by organic webshooters. Steve ( most likely) took a look at how spiders produce webbing, and saw it would not be at all convenient for the development of the character. Too many questions, like where in his body does he store all this fluid? How fast does he produce it? What happens if he runs out? Not to mention why the "shooters" are at the ends of his arms, not where they are on real spiders. (Add to this that spiders do not "shoot" their webbing, they play it out slowly.)

These were questions the Sam Raimi movies "solved" by ignoring them. Movie audiences, after all, tend not to ask such questions. Call a guy "Spider-Man" and have him walk thru walls, and most civilians wont even blink.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Eric Ladd
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 August 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 4066
Posted: 30 June 2015 at 1:09pm | IP Logged | 5  

I never saw Peter creating his web shooters as having a well thought out meaning. Web shooters were desired and thus wrote Peter created web shooters. Technology was created as needed without thought to how difficult or impossible it would be to create outside of a comic book reality.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Joe Hollon
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 13512
Posted: 30 June 2015 at 1:17pm | IP Logged | 6  

I guess it was natural that if you gave Marvel long enough they would become DC.  Legacy characters, multiple realities, etc.
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Trevor Thompson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 13 June 2015
Posts: 330
Posted: 30 June 2015 at 1:21pm | IP Logged | 7  

Thank you, Mr Byrne. I find the thought process into creating characters very interesting. To be honest,as a kid, I wouldn't even think to have the problems you mentioned answered, I'd have taken Spider-Man as he is but my adult mind got the better of me.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mark Haslett
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4925
Posted: 30 June 2015 at 1:56pm | IP Logged | 8  

These quotes are from two people on two separate projects.

Feige is talking about putting Spider-Man into his Marvel movies.

Slott is talking about his comics.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Stephen Robinson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5835
Posted: 30 June 2015 at 2:53pm | IP Logged | 9  

JAMES: So, basically, Marvel turned Peter Parker into Tony
Stark?

SER: Yeah, he's unrecognizable from the Lee/Ditko/Romitta
character. I think I've finally accepted that and just
enjoy the (finite) run from the 1960s.

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
James Woodcock
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 September 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 5863
Posted: 30 June 2015 at 3:24pm | IP Logged | 10  

Mark Haslett asked for context.

Well, to me doesn't matter whether they are talking about two different projects. It was a compare and contrast between two descriptions of Spider-Man.

One, the driving force is that he's a kid with incredible abilities.
The other, that he needs to realise his potential and become Tony Stark.

One sounds about right, the other .....


Edited by James Woodcock on 30 June 2015 at 3:26pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Dan Slott
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 August 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 45
Posted: 30 June 2015 at 3:48pm | IP Logged | 11  

"The are -- but I'll bet they don't think they are. Slott, of course, expresses the all too common fannish position the Change Is Good! And a quick review of the last forty years or so shows us how well that has worked out!"

To be fair, Mr. Byrne, didn't a lot of your best runs of Marvel/DC Comics start with a premise of "Change is Good!"

The Hulk and Bruce Banner get separated.

Namor uses the wealths of the oceans to become a major mogul.

Superman's origins from Krypton through Smallville through Metropolis get changed and over hauled.

She-Hulk becomes a break-the-fourth-wall style of comedy book.

And so on...

Reasonable comparisons, right?
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Imaginary X-Man

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 122055
Posted: 30 June 2015 at 4:32pm | IP Logged | 12  

"The are -- but I'll bet they don't think they are. Slott, of course, expresses the all too common fannish position the Change Is Good! And a quick review of the last forty years or so shows us how well that has worked out!"

To be fair, Mr. Byrne, didn't a lot of your best runs of Marvel/DC Comics start with a premise of "Change is Good!"

Let's take these one at a time, shall we?

The Hulk and Bruce Banner get separated.

And that was intended to be permanent? No.

Namor uses the wealths of the oceans to become a major mogul.

Which he'd done before, with Stan and Jack at the helm.

Superman's origins from Krypton through Smallville through Metropolis get changed and over hauled.

Which had happened many times before and since, and didn't change the character.

She-Hulk becomes a break-the-fourth-wall style of comedy book.

Which didn't change the character.

And so on...

Such as?

Reasonable comparisons, right?

You seem to think so. There's the problem in a nutshell.

Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 44 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login