Unless something monumentally stupid happens to Clinton between now and the election, and also based on the GOP field, she'll be the next President.  And the way the country's demographics are starting to lean, there may not be another Republican in the White House for a couple of decades.

If the various demographic groups vote the way we did in 2008 and 2012 (meaning the gross turnout numbers among demographics as well as the way each demographic voted) you're probably right.
Despite my unwillingness to support Mitt Romney in the last primary, and despite my certainty that he would lose the general election, as the general election polls began to come in showing Romney leading the incumbent among independents, middle-class voters and Catholics, I became convinced that despite his inherent weaknesses, Mitt Romney would win the election- in convincing fashion.  Obviously, I was very wrong in that regard.  But my conviction was based on historically rational criteria.  Prior to this last election, if you told me a candidate won independents by five points and the middle class by six, I'd tell you that candidate won the election; most likely in convincing fashion.

But that's not how it played out.  And this, I think, will be the most interesting question about the next election; can Hillary Clinton replicate the President's turnout model?  Is the winning voter coalition of 2008-12 the Democrat coalition going forward, or will it prove to be the Obama coalition; a unique response to a unique candidate?  I'm not even going to pretend to have the answer to that question, but I will be interested to watch.

But I will say this: Hillary Clinton is a far weaker candidate than the current President, and if there is even a small drop off in any of the President's key voter groups, the 2016 election will become very competitive.  I think both Walker and Rubio give Clinton more trouble than she expects, but Bush will lose going away unless the 2016 turnout looks more like the 2010-14 midterm turnout, than even 2000-04 presidential years.

what a hilarious 4 years it would be. before we were attacked by every other country. he wouldnt be worse than Kim Jong Il though...

Trump has sort of taken the role of this character, in the way he's been treating Republican politicians:

But any one of this crop of Republicans in office scares the living shit outta me.  

FEEL THE BERN!  2016!

the only point of Hillary is a woman in the office and then itll be Clinton shit as usual, but the US was flush during the last Clinton run. so it may be an economy boost.

pretty much every Republican looks like a jackass to me, at least slightly just because they're IN the party to begin with. they say the most stupid outdated racist religious shit (like arguing against climate change or even just good environmental policy) - i just cant remotely get behind any human that expects to run a mixed country according to the rules in the Bible. all they sound like is god fearing, scaredy cats afraid of anything they dont know, and anyone they dont understand. And its 10 times worse when they have THAT MANY people come out of the woodwork to run all against each other - shows complete party chaos. THEY'LL NEVER WIN any time soon. at this point, said to say they NEED Trump.