I simply suggest amending it with an explicit condition to make it fair to all the people who want to immigrate legally, and may have spent years waiting for a visa, etc.

The framers couldn't see all possible outcomes, so they left a mechanism to patch stuff down the line.  Think of the 22nd.  Didn't change the existing rules, it just added a limit to them.

A correct understanding of the intent of the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment and legislation passed by Congress in the late 19th century and in 1923 extending citizenship to American Indians provide ample proof that Congress has constitutional power to define who is within the “jurisdiction of the United States” and therefore eligible for citizenship. Simple legislation passed by Congress and signed by the president would be constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment.


*(Board rules question...when we quote from an article are we supposed to provide a link to the article or no?  Or are we not supposed to quote and just provide the link?)

Make no mistake, scaling back one of the greatest civil rights landmarks in American history in a legal effort affecting millions of people, would be interpreted as repeal.