And, yes, I concur with what has been said: it's a shame that they aren't as concerned about life when it comes to people being shot due to the availability of guns.

I'm no legal expert, but wouldn't this be unconstitutional in many ways?

***

Yes but that's true of everything.  Someone living in a sparsely populated area would have to travel further to get to a Wal-Mart; why wouldn't they have to travel further to get to an abortion clinic?  There is undeniable attack on women's rights and shutting down clinics, I just don't think that map is particularly reflective of it.  An area with few people just isn't likely to have an abortion clinic.

Sure someone in rural Wyoming probably has to go far for a clinic, but they probably have to go far for a dentist too!  My grandparents' lived in the boonies and it was a 30 minute drive to the nearest convenience store (or the not-very-convenient store).

I'm not trying to make light of the lack of availability, but there's context too.  If there's only a handful of people living in an area, there probably isn't going to be a clinic.

And I'll suggest that the life of the baby, the moment it is born, is even less important. In fact, most often the direction goes from saving a life to endless years of shaming it by the very same people.

Sorry, but if you can't/won't allow pro choice plates, then I don't believe pro life plates should be allowed, either.

(And personally, I believe abortions should be illegal purely as birth control, but should be allowed in the case of rape, incest, danger to the mother or if the baby will be born extremely mentally or physically impaired to the point of making their life unbearable. If a state doesn't want to allow abortions, then they should have to set up anonymous drop-offs at hospitals and orphanages for unwanted babies that result from the instances I mentioned.)