Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
Movies
Byrne Robotics > Movies
Topic: Pirates of the Caribbean 5 Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Bill Mimbu
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 April 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 6725
Posted: 04 May 2017 at 9:59pm | IP Logged | 1 post reply

Still debating whether or not to go see this, especially after Pirates 4 (saw that only on cable, and still felt like I'd walked the plank)...

However, thought this was a clever bit of promotion on the part of Disney:

Johnny Depp appears in Disneyland's Pirates Ride
Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 31668
Posted: 04 May 2017 at 10:27pm | IP Logged | 2 post reply

When I look back on it, the only film in the franchise I really enjoyed was the first.  Every movie after that was a cascade of moderately bad to downright awful.  I'll pass on the fifth one, thank you very much!
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jozef Brandt
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 March 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 2198
Posted: 05 May 2017 at 1:25am | IP Logged | 3 post reply


I kinda liked the 4th one, but I'm a big fan of Tim Powers (and the publisher I worked for eons ago published some of his books).  I'd probably re-watch the 4th one before I'd rewatch the 2nd or 3rd.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Thom Price
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
L’Homme Diabolique

Joined: 29 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 7561
Posted: 05 May 2017 at 6:26am | IP Logged | 4 post reply

I enjoy the first quite a bit, thought the second and third were bloated and cynical, and found four to be a slight improvement over the other sequels.  I think the trailers for the new film look fantastic except ... Johnny Depp.  I know he's the star of the franchise, but I find him to be increasingly tedious.  His overly quirky performances were a lark at first, but now it's just annoying shtick. I'm up-in-the-air about seeing this one. 
Back to Top profile | search | www | email
 
Steven Myers
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 10 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4934
Posted: 06 May 2017 at 7:07am | IP Logged | 5 post reply

I didn't know there was a 4th. Despite the cliffhanger, I never bothered with III.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Shaun Barry
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 December 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 4940
Posted: 06 May 2017 at 8:44am | IP Logged | 6 post reply


Even the original is overlong, but the sequels are stereotypical of some of the unnecessary sequel bloat that has crept into the summer movie season over the last decade or two.  I'd be more inclined to follow this series if they were light and breezy 90 min. or 2 hour adventures, but knowing that they all clock-in between 130-160 minutes, filled to the brim with preposterous CGI overload and (now-tiresome) Johnny Depp schtick...

...sorry, but that's my idea of movie hell.  (And a double bill with TRANSFORMERS 5 could kill me.)





Edited by Shaun Barry on 06 May 2017 at 9:51am
Back to Top profile | search
 
James Woodcock
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 September 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3912
Posted: 07 May 2017 at 7:36am | IP Logged | 7 post reply

I watched the first on DVD and just could not see what anyone saw in the film. I've never been to DisneyWorld so had no emotional attachment to the idea, and the film didn't add any to that position.

Have not watched any of the others. Can't say I feel like I've missed anything as each advert just looks like more of the same. I'm sure I must be wrong and this is the position of a total outsider to Star Wars or Marvel but I know those films do have differences. This? I'm not sure
Back to Top profile | search | email
 
Brian Hunt
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5172
Posted: 07 May 2017 at 9:47pm | IP Logged | 8 post reply

I've found these films to be as good as their villains.
I loved the character of Davy Jones. The fourth wasn't
as compelling without an equivalent. The new one show's
some promise in this regard.
Back to Top profile | search | email
 
Matt Hawes
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 13544
Posted: 13 May 2017 at 6:59pm | IP Logged | 9 post reply

Paul McCartney will have a role (a cameo, I assume) in "Pirates of The Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales."  Leave it to Paul to star in the movie with a title that will only encourage those "Paul Is Dead" conspiracy types. Heh.

"Look, the title is proof Paul was replaced with a lookalike in 1966."

Here's the pic:

LINK!


Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Robert Shepherd
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 March 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 737
Posted: 14 May 2017 at 12:39pm | IP Logged | 10 post reply

I really liked the first one. I thought Johnny Depp was brilliant in portraying Jack Sparrow. But over time, that kind of campy humor does get old.

I tend to believe most franchises should stop at three movies. A good trilogy feels right.  A beginning, a middle, an end. Anything longer than that and things grow stale. 
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Thom Price
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
L’Homme Diabolique

Joined: 29 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 7561
Posted: 27 May 2017 at 2:36pm | IP Logged | 11 post reply

I found it to be ... okay.  I suppose I might regard it as the second best film in the series, but that's not saying much.  PIRATES, like so many franchises, has been coasting on the goodwill of the original.  Four and five weren't as bad as two and three, but still a far cry from being good.

There are a few effective sequences that evoke the basics -- pirates meet ghosts -- but the movie is crushed under excessive FX, overly choreographed slapstick, and ludicrous action set pieces.  Johnny Depp's Jack Sparrow remains more of a hindrance than an asset; the novelty of that character wore off long ago.  The real star of the films, for me, has been Geoffrey Rush, an actor who can do florid without veering into camp.

Short-version: a just barely adequate diversion.
Back to Top profile | search | www | email
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login