Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 7 Next >>
Topic: Q For Mr Byrne: De-Uniquing’s Legacy Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Andrew Bitner
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 7485
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 7:05am | IP Logged | 1 post reply

The thing about "pre-unique" characters is that they are still spinoffs of the original. There wouldn't have been a "first Hulk" if there hadn't been a Hulk. Ditto Batman, et al. It's another form of de-uniquing, to say "oh hey, I wasn't exactly the *first* to be Captain So-and-So..."

First example I can think of is introducing Black Adam as the "first Captain Marvel"--any others predate that one?

And Robbie? I agree about the whole "writing for the trade" mentality forcing writers into doing arcs instead of one-two-three part stories. The industry has leaned into that model, though, knowing they can make more money over a longer period of time with trades than with monthlies.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Robbie Parry
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 June 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 12186
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 7:10am | IP Logged | 2 post reply

Yes, you're right. It does make me smile at times. I mean, "We can build the world's first bionic man - but, hang on, we did create one before that." Or, "We've put so much effort into building KITT, but there was this KARR prior to that..."

It can be fun in some respects. 
Back to Top profile | search
 
Andrew Bitner
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 7485
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 7:12am | IP Logged | 3 post reply

It can be. It goes the route of several Marvel movies, pitting the hero against his "evil twin." Thing is, though, wouldn't the LATER version be more powerful? Why would the earlier prototype be able to beat the more advanced production model? ;)

(BTW, I know that "the SEVEN Million Dollar Man" didn't precede Steve Austin, though I think KARR came after KITT.)
Back to Top profile | search
 
Robbie Parry
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 June 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 12186
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 8:27am | IP Logged | 4 post reply

I can't recall the exact details, but if I were to guess, KARR was developed and locked away as they hadn't programmed "compassion" into him. 
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132316
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 8:30am | IP Logged | 5 post reply

The concept of parallel universes -- which leads immediately to contemplation of "alternate realities" -- is a valid scientific theory that predates its appearance in comics. In an infinite multiverse, we've all been de-uniqued an infinite number of times.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Robbie Parry
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 June 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 12186
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 8:44am | IP Logged | 6 post reply

 John Byrne wrote:
In an infinite multiverse, we've all been de-uniqued an infinite number of times.

So there is a you on another earth who had a 5 or 6 year tenure writing and drawing TRANSFORMERS? ;-) 
Back to Top profile | search
 
Andrew Bitner
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 7485
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 8:47am | IP Logged | 7 post reply

Truly more than meets the eye. ;)
Back to Top profile | search
 
Rebecca Jansen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 February 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 4540
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 10:33am | IP Logged | 8 post reply

I'm new to the concept terms so I was definitely getting it all wrong. I'm still pretty muddled up, but that's kind of like the comics themselves.

Iron Fist had a rival before him who thought he should have the 'iron fist' power but was in too big a hurry and blew it. Looked very similar and went off in exile to our world while Danny Rand was starting out, or something like that. He went on to steal the 'iron fist' power but still couldn't handle it and it destroyed him.

The old Fawcetts had a bunch of Lieutenant Marvels and an Uncle Marvel as well as the Family and Hoppy, which inspired all the Super this than and the other things with Superman (miniature Superman Emergency Rescue Squad from bottle city Kandor anyone?)... and all the Bat this and that... Ace The Bathound maybe being the Beppo The Super Monkey of that whole scene. DC had all the so-and-so as a boy or girl or baby stuff too. And what about all the Green Lanterns, but that was cool, they even had a Squirrel Green Lantern just before Rocket Racoon I think.

The first super-heroine was a knock-off a male hero... Bulletgirl (Fawcett again), just a little before Wonder Woman. This is the kind of trivia where people look at you like you have gone entirely insane however. The first alternate world story I know of was the modern Flash reading an old comic book about the '40s Flash. I'll try to keep following the concept, but I'm probably still not getting it am I? :^(


Edited by Rebecca Jansen on 14 June 2018 at 10:34am
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Peter Martin
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 March 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 15809
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 11:44am | IP Logged | 9 post reply

Rebecca, de-uniquing is really what the term suggests: taking a character that has unique attributes and then replicating them in a specific and transparent manner in another character so as to render the original no longer unique.

An example is Superman. He is the last survivor of Krypton and wears a specific uniform. When we introduce Supergirl, Superman is no longer the last survivor of Krypton. She also wears a derivation of his uniform and her name is also a derivation. Superman is no longer unique. 

I say specific and transparent, to clarify that replication of general characteristics is not an example of de-uniquing. Tony Stark is a genius inventor and so is Reed Richards, but one is not carbon-copied/derived from the other.

This thread has introduced another term/concept, 'pre-uniquing', of a character clearly derived from another so as to render the original no longer unique, but with the added twist that (in terms of story continuity) the copy came first.

So She-Hulk de-uniques Hulk.

Lore, in Star Trek, pre-uniques Data.

(As I understand it!)

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Cole
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 02 March 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 504
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 11:46am | IP Logged | 10 post reply

I Always thought Superman was more of a direct rip-off of John Carter of Mars than anything else.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Andrew Saxon
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 June 2016
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 337
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 11:58am | IP Logged | 11 post reply

In an infinite multiverse, we've all been de-uniqued an infinite number of times.

As much as I enjoy the idea in fiction, I've always found the idea of an infinite number of near identical universes a bit wasteful. For instance, just before sitting down at my desk now, I made a coffee and had to choose a mug. There were six mugs to pick from on the shelf so presumably there were are five new universes that were created where I chose one of the other mugs (of course, I - this me - could be in one of the branching realities and not on the main limb). Inevitable jokes aside, I just don't see the point of there being six duplicates of me based on my choosing a mug for my coffee (and then there are the universes where I'm drinking tea or maybe had a coke instead, from the can or in a glass). I'm not saying it isn't a valid theory, btw., just that my being thirsty doesn't seem a good enough reason for creating whole new realities containing everything this universe contains except for that one tiny and insignificant detail.


Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Robbie Parry
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 June 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 12186
Posted: 14 June 2018 at 12:38pm | IP Logged | 12 post reply

Rebecca, I think Peter has explained it very well.

I can take things on their own merits. Evil doppelgangers are great - we all love the Faker in HE-MAN, right? - and I quite enjoy the character of Speedy.

It's all subjective. There may be someone out there who wants EVEN MORE Spider-Man spin-offs; and then there are people like me who think there are too many. I think there should be a limit. I mean, for Pete's sake, they even got a bionic dog into THE SIX MILLION DOLLAR MAN.

De-uniquing also applies, as stated earlier, to gadgets, vehicles, etc. In the TV series AIRWOLF, Airwolf was this billion-dollar helicopter, one of a kind supposedly. Until an evil doppelganger (Redwolf) came along. And, in the fourth season episode "Scorpion", there was another model. Not a unique helicopter, after all.

Sometimes I like a little twist. In THUNDERCATS, Tygra was a cool character. Then we got Bengali, another "tiger-man". Only he was a white tiger with a different personality, abilities and weapons. So I think if de-uniquing is to be a thing, try and at least vary it a little.
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 7 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login