Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 2
Topic: Question for JB, Changes to Characters Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Mason Meomartini
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 June 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 174
Posted: 23 July 2018 at 5:52pm | IP Logged | 1 post reply

These series entering the Elseworlds/What If? theme is a really interesting thought Eric for a couple of reasons, because it seems that with the size of the market being so small and mostly the same readers staying around for decades, this is inevitably what happens when you have to keep capturing the same people's interest again and again.  Like the old Superman comics that had weird scenarios every issue outside of the status quo.  

Would it be better if the two main super hero universes just left any continuity behind and only have stories where each story arc or graphic novel is its own thing, completely unrelated to any other story?  Where the setup can be wildly different each time like What If and Elseworlds?  We've had decades of one continuous fictional reality for each of the big two companies anyway, where everything has been done and done to death, so would it matter if it ends now?  Would this be a good thing since it's almost like going full circle, right back to the way Marvel and DC comics used to be, with single issue stories that weren't hampered by every single story that came before.  Just in a more extreme form where even basic consistent backgrounds don't have to necessarily be followed.


Edited by Mason Meomartini on 23 July 2018 at 5:57pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Hague
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 November 2006
Posts: 8515
Posted: 23 July 2018 at 8:28pm | IP Logged | 2 post reply

Essentially, what you propose is what we have today, Mason. There are "in continuity" books for those who insist that the mainstream titles must all tie in with a larger world, but at the same time, there are sideline books a-plenty being published that feature different takes on the characters. Batman Earth-One, and Realworlds, and Elseworlds, Batman '66, Brave and the Bold, Animated, Batman Beyond, the other "no, really, we're serious this time" Batman Beyond, the Batman who shows up in Scooby-Doo Team-Up with Robin, and the weird OTHER Robin who everyone says is the same guy despite his tiny size, different voice, Sonic the Hedgehog haircut, and pals in the Titans... 

Plus, the continuities keep getting flummoxed, inverted, rebooted, and discarded over and over again...

There may as well be no continuity any longer. It's weird that the companies still pretend there is.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Eric Jansen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 October 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 2292
Posted: 23 July 2018 at 11:11pm | IP Logged | 3 post reply

It is not my experience that it's the fans that have been around forever who demand changes in the characters.  I have a number of now middle-aged (or older) friends who have been reading forever and they're the ones who are most upset when longstanding favorites are altered drastically.  They all believe in "putting the toys back in the toybox."

In my experience, it is the younger fans who grew up on the TV shows or movies (or unrelated book series where the characters are often taken from birth or childhood to old age or death) who expect the same from the comics they have just discovered.

I am the only one I know (in person or somewhere like this forum) who splits it by company.  I firmly believe that the DC heroes are mostly timeless/iconic and should never change.  On the other hand, I expect the Marvel heroes to slowly age and change.  But that is not because I've been reading too long, but possibly (I am now wondering) because that is what I was exposed to when I first came on board in the 70's.  Spider-Man had already graduated from high school (which I saw in MARVEL TALES), moved on to college, even graduated from college fairly early on for me, saw his great love Gwen Stacy die (and I saw her father die in reprints), and dealt with the death of his arch-enemy Norman Osborn/Green Goblin and the "sequels" of Harry Osborn taking over for him, and then even the Hobgoblin taking Harry's place, etc.  Mr. Fantastic and the Invisible Girl were parents who aged along with with their son Franklin, and the X-Men were no longer teens but now young adults who experienced a lot of Uncanny change.

It is ironic to me that it is the DC heroes who keep aging and changing (even through numerous reboots)--Superman and Batman both have sons, all the favorite TEEN Titans are no longer teens, and old JSA favorites have all been aged out of usability (did anybody really want to see a 100-year-old Johnny Thunder being mistreated in the old folks home?)--while the Marvel characters have settled into being ageless and re-settable.  (Things like Spider-Man or Daredevil's identities being revealed and then being forgotten prove it.  Peter Parker being a rich CEO for two years is as temporary as Archie and pals experiencing the lives of King Arthur and his Knights in a one-off story.)


Edited by Eric Jansen on 23 July 2018 at 11:13pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Rebecca Jansen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 February 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 4520
Posted: 24 July 2018 at 11:20am | IP Logged | 4 post reply

A Gasoline Alley or real time 'universe' of super powered chartacters could be interesting. I'm sure someone has done it. In a way Marvel did seem to do it at one time where '40s characters like the Whizzer were old and aged in the '70s Avengers comics. The ultimate reality though is that characters are worth real money in our 'universe', so while you can have Dick Grayson become Batman when Bruce Wayne retires etc., no company is going to permanently write-out or kill off something that can still generate profit. Real time Kitty Pryde would now be 51, Peter Parker at least 73, and Archie Andrews I don't wanna think about. :^)

I think a lot of the problems have been making changes so overly dramatic. It's like a soap opera with car crashes and serial killers every single show... supposedly historic ratings-grabbers, but no subtety, no sustainability. Is there much art or craft in making readers feel something for say an extremely physically tortured Batgirl for instance, or is it in feeling Sue Storm's angst for her son's future? The less subtety the more most comic writers have burned through things at an alarming pace! As a subtler artist how do you compete with the lurid big boobs and the graphic death scenes? Well, Archie has survived mostly without playing those cards, and Disney... been going in comics since the early '40s at least. I go with what has been proven over time and the late '80s-'90s excess just proved you could sell multiple copies of one thing to an ever smaller base while driving others away. I can't imagine handing a normal kid some of the bizarre extreme supposedly mainstream superhero comics of the dark ages after Dark Knight anymore than I'd hand them a Spain Rodriguez Rand Holmes underground comic. I would feel good about introuducing them to John Byrne Fantastic Four or Walt Simonson Thor though, but the companies broke that trust as have some comic collector shops in my opinion. Sustainability requires trust in your brand! Lobo might be funny for a side character who appears irregularly, but as the kind of basket to put all your eggs in it's off-putting to a pretty wide potential audience. Although lighting a cigar with an Action #1 was great to see! :^)
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Rebecca Jansen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 February 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 4520
Posted: 24 July 2018 at 12:28pm | IP Logged | 5 post reply

It's funny, when Dark Knight was published and The Punisher started being packaged as a hero there was an attitude about how this was superheroes as a form becoming more real. But they weren't really, Dark Knight was almost political caricature or Kurt Vonnegut satire through extreme juxtapositions of an aging costumed fanatic and a world and villains gone extreme. Extreme is not realism at all. Focusing on ever more graphic violence and saying if you can't handle it there's something immature about you is how I felt I was being addressed by a lot of comic series as a mid '80s reader who was by then an adult. Basically I said I have seen enough of that in reality, perhaps unlike some of these modern creators, i don't have any need for it taking over the comic books and wiping out characters I'd come to care about like there was something wrong with caring.

Let's go back to a couple of the real game-changers that lifted Marvel out of the place DC had buried them regarding superpowered characters. Pilot Ben Grimm/The Thing and student Peter Parker/The Spider-Man were the real advancers of the genre. Ben Grimm was loaded with pathos by his situation and yet coped with humor most of the time, sort of winking at the readers sometimes about the nutty characters the Fantastic Four had coming after them. He was on your side, you were on his, and it was good. Then poor Peter Parker, nerd and awkward outcast, initially going for the money and finding out his Uncle paid for his moment of selfishness! He had relatable problems and the numbers against him, not just the nutty villains but the local newspaper, and he still had to make the money for his aunt. Yet pluckily he still managed to crack a joke or a private smile, but we were with him too. This was a kind a realism that hadn't been seen before.

Fast forward to the anti-heroes laden late '80s and '90s comics and the humor was gone mostly from many comics but for a kind of dark and sick maniacal Joker smile reveling in sheer graphic grue and psychological traumas of the most blatant sort. It's not that they couldn't have a rape or death or AIDs, but more why were they doing it... to communicate something human and sensitizing or to just 'make history' supposedly stretching the format further and selling more copies to collectors? The muscles and female bodies sure as heck did not get more real in this period though, they got plain ludicrous to me. Male characters seemed to exist to grit teeth and vow bloody vengeance over and over, and females to vapidly pose and die over and over. You'd think the creators of these comics were strange shut-ins away from all contact with real human beings and feeding solely on the worst headlines in a newspaper plopped through their door slot.

I think the lessons are being learned about a kind of slash and burn farming approach to super characters... the need for a young audience if you are ever to have a truly adult one as well. The best Art sensitizes, there can be a place for the heavy rock song of AC/DC that gets the blood moving alongside Beethoven's Pastoral Symphony, but recognize the fully developed human being needs all kinds of musical expression. So super characters should be ultimately about the actual relatable beings under the masks, and the more extreme or even inhuman the fewer are going to be able to relate as potential readers and buyers. If you don't approach your creations as worthy of your care you are not approaching your readers that way either, and are just an angry god of a sort visiting your frustrations upon your work.

It's hard to play straight with a necessarily visual gaudy costume involved, it looks really bad and backwards when when it doesn't work, it's repellent. Some of the most adult comic stories I've ever seen were war stories, and yet the creators supposedly striving for more realism and adultness would tend to look down on anything but superhero comics as important, certainly a lot of collectors also fit that bill. Comics have done all kinds of genres successfully; war, horror, detective, western-historical, romance, and even gained adult readers with those formats at least for awhile. The super character obsession through fans-turned-pro jettisoned a lot of that. Most every country has had long running and successful sports comics too, but not America.

Just some more thoughts. I guess better to over-think sometimes than to be truly thoughtless which is what I found turned me away from comics and comic specialist shops a few decades ago. Some of the last titles I followed were high on thoughtfulness and care... the Pinis' Elfquest, Lee & Kaluta's Starstruck, DeMatties & Muth's Moonshadow, Mark Schultz' Xenozoic Tales. I did buy the four Dark Knight books and started Watchmen, but the followers of those two combined with a near cartoony and no less simplistic exaggeration sent me packing as a young adult and kept me away. I think comics from that time are now a dollar a dozen almost literally, and of little value even to those who did stick around. Maybe they should just start recycling them literally and not let that false macho realism infect and break things ever again. I cared and was made to not care anymore, to just say kill them all and start something new, a Zot or Bone or Go Girl that still managed to poke through the thickening gloom.

Edited by Rebecca Jansen on 24 July 2018 at 12:30pm
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Peter Martin
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 March 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 15794
Posted: 24 July 2018 at 12:42pm | IP Logged | 6 post reply

Watchmen and DKR were set apart from the main continuity at DC, intended to exist in their own little silos and, as many have mentioned here, inadvertently sent waves of imitation throughout nearly all titles, to the detriment of superhero comics in general.

For my money, Watchmen and DKR were both very well made stories that happened to be set in a violent and grim milieu. The unfortunate takeaway by the imitators was they were good because they were in a violent and grim milieu (heck, I used to make my own cruddy home-made comics and I did the same idiot imitation in my own creations, because I wanted my stuff to be awesome like Dark Knight. I did keep my thought balloons though).

The thing that I find inexplicable was The Killing Joke. Because that was Moore operating directly in the main continuity of DC and it was just reprehensible and ugly and not even a good story.


Edited by Peter Martin on 24 July 2018 at 12:43pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Robbie Parry
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 June 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 12186
Posted: 24 July 2018 at 12:46pm | IP Logged | 7 post reply

 Peter Martin wrote:
The thing that I find inexplicable was The Killing Joke. Because that was Moore operating directly in the main continuity of DC and it was just reprehensible and ugly and not even a good story.


Have I entered the Twilight Zone?

I have never understood the appeal of that story. Each to their own, of course, but I was very disappointed with it. 

I used to have an informal meet-up with some folks that used to talk about comics. They all liked it. Fine. But when I said I didn't, you'd have thought I'd confessed to being Jack the Ripper. If looks could kill!

If people like it, more power to them. I don't like or get SAGA, either, but if online reviews are anything to go by, it's considered the best thing since sliced bread. But THE KILLING JOKE is one story whose popularity continues to baffle me.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Hague
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 November 2006
Posts: 8515
Posted: 24 July 2018 at 3:52pm | IP Logged | 8 post reply

Robbie, I disagree, but I understand how you feel. I feel much the same way about Brad Metzler's lauded "Identity Crisis." It's too ugly and venal to stand with the comics it places itself squarely in the midst of, and has no real redeeming features as it turns the JLA members into brainwashers and self-appointed mutilators (see also: Doc Savage.) 

With Doc, those brain operations were a weird sort of pulp novel conceit, forgivable at the time because they worked. The criminals led better lives. Society was made safer. "Identity Crisis" commits the same sin, but the lobotomies they perform do not in fact work, nor was there ever the slightest reason for the JLA to think they would. Only Batman stands against these police state tactics (see also: Gruenwald's "Squadron Supreme" mini-series) and he gets lobotomized along with the others for his troubles. "Identity Crisis" should have been the very last comic DC ever published, in much the same way "Civil War" should have been the last book Marvel ever put out. Both reduced their characters to murderous, venal creeps. 

In the case of "The Killing Joke," however, ugly as the events therein are, the story itself is redeemed by the Batman's attempt, his last attempt perhaps, at finding the remnants of whatever was once human inside the Joker, and later, his following through on his promise to Gordon that he would bring the Joker in "by the book." 

We see the events that broke an otherwise blameless man, shattered his psyche, and turned him into a murderer. Of course, insanity doesn't really work that way (see also: Two-Face,) and so Moore himself has said that the book doesn't accurately describe real characters behaving in anything resembling a realistic fashion. One of his regrets with the book was that the conflict takes place between two characters who in no way behave like real people, and is thus a commentary on nothing except the Batman/Joker conflict itself as it appears in the comics. It has no value aside from that. 

In writing a piece that called for a measure of understanding for the mentally ill, he was not able to write the Joker as someone who accurately represented those concerns. "Killing Joke" remains, nonetheless, one of the very, very few comics out there that actually treats the Joker as if he is insane, and not some brilliantly fiendish genius who has the whole justice system snowed as to his state of mind. Does the guy belong in an asylum or doesn't he? The comics seem to want to have it both ways, and thus the police, the courts, and the medical community are constantly made to look like suckers.

It's been said that "The Killing Joke" was originally intended as a Batman annual, and that Moore never intended it to appear as some sort of deluxe, stand-alone volume. I wonder if that original scheduling was to take place during one of DC's "Elseworlds" events. The Batmobile and the photo of the 50's-era Bat-Family would seem to place the book outside of DC's then-current, Post-Crisis continuity. I can't help but wonder if Moore's infamous call to Len Wein, the book's editor, requesting permission to shoot Barbara Gordon (to which he was told, after Wein checked with Publisher Jeanette Kahn, "cripple the bitch") took place because the book was now being published in continuity rather than the way it was originally conceived. 

Just a theory, but the comic itself doesn't fit in well at all with what had been set down in Crisis and established afterwards. It was also in production for a very long time. I can't help thinking it was never intended to have the impact that it did, either within the DC Universe or without.


Edited by Brian Hague on 24 July 2018 at 3:55pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Rebecca Jansen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 February 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 4520
Posted: 24 July 2018 at 5:29pm | IP Logged | 9 post reply

Now Killing Jone has been made into an R-rated cartoon for adults on top of the comic. It's a real mixed message doing these things to characters like Batman and Batgirl. If the appropriate response is supposed to be "nobody cared about Batgirl anyway" then I get to the fine, kill them all point pretty quickly. All I've ever seen is the splash page that ran in some news section at the time of Batgirl graphically being shot, and the cover. Seems like a thousand other characters adopted that insane grin thing after this. Mainstream comics doing extremely underground stories with characters created for 12 year olds of the past... how's that working out for you/us?

Whatever kind of adult that is for, and I have read lots of undergrounds, I'd much prefer them to be Trashman and Wonder Warthog and not Batman and Batgirl for real. I would like to use the word retarded, it's a word in the dictionary, but when I do even though it seems very appropriate to me I usually get some PC thing in my face for it. Superheroes for adult, R-rated and X-rated even... what is that if it's not that r word? Is it great literature? Is it updating an archetype for more demanding needs? Then why the costumes and logos and all that kiddie visual vocabulary? Maybe it's just inappropriate taken that far. It's certainly proven unsustainable to all but the most blindly fanatic, and not drawing a large audience for too long.

The joke is on us. I cared about Supergirl and I cared at least a little about Batgirl too. I saw them both ground into some dirt and sneered at by fan-pros and fanatics for their ego or something, and not for something that sensitizes or serves any positive purpose outside short term sales. Enjoy! This is why a lot of people left and most will never return. This is also what kept others from coming in at all. I'd rather see a hundred copies with a hundred readers than a hundred copies never opened owned by one maybe reader. Important comic books = an oxymoron?

And they're all back alive again, how nice. Bleh. :^|
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Adam Schulman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 July 2017
Posts: 1717
Posted: 26 July 2018 at 4:02pm | IP Logged | 10 post reply

The thing that I find inexplicable was The Killing Joke. Because that was Moore operating directly in the main continuity of DC and it was just reprehensible and ugly and not even a good story.

***

Moore didn't intend for THE KILLING JOKE to be a canonical tale and was surprised when it suddenly became one. He also considers it to be among his worst writings (it is). 

I say this even though I liked Barbara Gordon as Oracle. (Though when Batman's broken back was healed I thought "oh, so Batman has to get all better at the drop of a hat, but Batgirl has to stay disabled? That's real classy.") 

I don't have a problem at all with stories about super-people aimed at older readers being printed, but they really need to be set in universes entirely apart from mainstream DC and Marvel. That's what STORWATCH and THE AUTHORITY were, and I liked them quite a lot, at least during the Warren Ellis years. 

Of course, then came The New 52 and the Wildstorm Universe characters were shoehorned into the same universe as the Justice League, Teen Titans, etc. And it Did. Not. Work. At. All.

Hell, it was such a stupid idea that it seems that everyone's completely forgotten about it. We haven't even seen Apollo and Midnighter since 2016. 
Back to Top profile | search
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

<< Prev Page of 2
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login