Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
TV
Byrne Robotics > TV Page of 2 Next >>
Topic: End Early/On Top, or Overstay Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Trevor Smith
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 September 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 3102
Posted: 07 June 2019 at 6:35am | IP Logged | 1 post reply

A question inspired by the Friends reunion thread - when
it comes to TV series, what do we *really* want, as
viewers? It seems we (me!) are never *truly* happy. A
series drags on past it's best before date and there are
cries of "ugh, should have hung it up long ago" and
suchlike. But go out on a high note at the height of
popularity and it's "NOOOOOOOOO" and we're sad, we miss
the characters, etc. What's the answer? Is there one?
Are we just flat out impossible to please?
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Michael Penn
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 April 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 10650
Posted: 07 June 2019 at 7:08am | IP Logged | 2 post reply

I appreciate very much when a show stops at peak quality, which does not necessarily overlap with popularity. For example, "Seinfeld" was #1 at the end, but after Larry David left, for me the show's quality dipped so severely I would have been perfectly satisfied if it had ended with his departure. There's an element of Monday Morning Quarterbacking in even that mere opinion, though.


Back to Top profile | search
 
Bill Collins
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 May 2005
Location: England
Posts: 10786
Posted: 07 June 2019 at 7:21am | IP Logged | 3 post reply

I loved CSI at the start, but when there were 3
different versions airing, the quality really did drop
off and it became a chore to watch, similarly, the DC
series Arrow, Flash etc are past their sell by date in
my opinion. Leave them wanting more!
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Vinny Valenti
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 6675
Posted: 07 June 2019 at 7:49am | IP Logged | 4 post reply

"Seinfeld" was #1 at the end, but after Larry David left, for me the show's quality dipped so severely I would have been perfectly satisfied if it had ended with his departure."

---

Seinfeld got...."weird" after LD left. There were still episodes that I enjoyed but there was definitely something that felt different about them. There was some definite Flanderization at play. George not being able to avoid running over squirrels. Kramer thinking he's hosting a talk show inside his apartment (granted that episode had me laughing, but still I realized that they were stretching the character too thin).
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jim Muir
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 June 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1238
Posted: 07 June 2019 at 9:19am | IP Logged | 5 post reply

Its unwinnable - you have no way of knowing a show has reached its peak until you're halfway down the other side in the middle of the dreadful following season!
Back to Top profile | search
 
Steve De Young
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 April 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 3315
Posted: 07 June 2019 at 9:53am | IP Logged | 6 post reply

There can also be peaks and valleys.  I was listening to Alec Baldwin talk about 30 Rock last night.  He said that he and others had felt that season 5 was relatively week, and wondered if maybe they shouldn’t pack it in.  But then the same folks felt like season 6 was among their best work and were ready to keep going.  
Back to Top profile | search
 
Peter Martin
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 March 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 12046
Posted: 07 June 2019 at 10:17am | IP Logged | 7 post reply

For me it's easy: end early before decline sets in. Better to have that and have viewers saying they miss the show than keep going on until things seem very samey. I think it is very rare that a show has enough quality and ideas to justify going beyond a third season (for the record, I gave up on Friends in the third season).
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Popa
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 March 2008
Posts: 3405
Posted: 07 June 2019 at 1:49pm | IP Logged | 8 post reply

In TV, as in everything, I'm in favor of a well-planned and executed ending instead of a serial that limps to a finish or gets the plug pulled by the suits.

I'd rather go find something new.

Edited by John Popa on 07 June 2019 at 1:49pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Trevor Smith
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 September 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 3102
Posted: 07 June 2019 at 3:04pm | IP Logged | 9 post reply

"For me it's easy: end early before decline sets in."

**

And I think that's pretty much how I'm leaning. As much
as a case like, say, Rome, just kills me, I'd much
rather be left wanting more than see something I once
loved descend into utter tripe.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Brian Hague
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 November 2006
Posts: 8402
Posted: 07 June 2019 at 11:27pm | IP Logged | 10 post reply

I'm going to vote the other way. While we can bemoan and gnash our teeth over dreadful final seasons, the thing we enjoyed for so long is still there, in some form. 

No one despises Buffy Season 7 more than I do. I hate that year with a passion. Nonetheless, it is more Buffy than we'd have had had the show ended with Season 5, as Whedon truly thought it might, hence the finality of that season's last episode. 

Had it gone out then, fans would still be bitching and moaning over the move to college and Glory (which is a complaint I share. The show started the season with the joke that Harmony was going to be the Big Bad. Then it subverted that with the reveal that the true villain was... basically Harmony, only with more powers. Hated Glory. Hated Ben. The whole storyline with the two of them can go die in traffic.) But overall, they'd have been fine with that being it.

And we'd never have gotten the Musical. Or been able to spend more time with Anya. Or Faith. We'd have lost out on time with Spike. Hey, I like Dawn. More Dawn was just fine with me. Yeah, the episodes themselves were not the best ever, but many of them were still very good. 

All of this "kill it before I hate it" snobbery is disingenuous. We may not go back and revisit those despised later seasons of our favorite shows after we've seen them once, but for the most part, we were still watching while they were on. There were good episodes or at least good moments in among the dross. So long as there's life, there's hope. And where there's Hope, there's Crosby.*

* Joke from St. Elsewhere, another show that arguably overstayed its welcome, yet gave television an immortal moment with that final episode's last moments. Even a show on its last legs usually has something to offer. Sometimes something amazing.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Brian Floyd
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 July 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 6604
Posted: 08 June 2019 at 12:29am | IP Logged | 11 post reply

The problem with some shows is that you get so invested that you almost feel an obligation to keep watching.

FRASIER should have ended a season or two earlier, with Daphne and Niles never getting together.

FRIENDS went on a season or two too long. 

HAPPY DAYS is responsible for the term "jumping the shark" from a season 5 episode, but it really didn't start going downhill until Ron Howard left (season 7), and really hit the toilet in season 9.

Trying to keep THE GOLDEN GIRLS going without Bea Arthur as THE GOLDEN PALACE was a big mistake.

I've been slogging my way through ARROW for the past two seasons, and am glad it is ending. The prison arc and the future segments definitely did not help. (I disagree with Bill Collins about the other CW DC shows....though I wish they'd drop the Tom Cavanaugh playing a different alternate version of Wells bit on THE FLASH each season.)

Some shows have been ruined by major cast changes. Look at the original CSI and NCIS (which I can't believe is still airing), for example. On the other hand, LAW & ORDER's cast changes helped keep it fresh.

(Incidentally, I gave up on SEINFELD in season two.) 
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Trevor Smith
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 September 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 3102
Posted: 08 June 2019 at 3:55am | IP Logged | 12 post reply

"All of this "kill it before I hate it" snobbery"

**

I wouldn't call it "snobbery".
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 

Page of 2 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login