Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 7 Next >>
Topic: Official ACTION COMICS 828 thread (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Andrew Hilsmann
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 844
Posted: 10 June 2005 at 9:38pm | IP Logged | 1  

 John Byrne wrote:
No one else has mentioned the two pages with the George Perez storytelling (Inserts? Insets? Inline graphics? Don't know what term to use) -- the page where Repulse "armors up" and Superman's moment of truth with Black Adam.

****

Somewhere, the shade of Will Eisner is astonished to learn he was swiping George Perez.



Well alrighty then. Again, I liked it, but Perez is definitely a man who likes those thick black borders around those smaller panels. (I recently re-read the first 9 issues of his Wonder Woman reboot and was struck by the use of Perez Simultaneity -- his extroverted paneling style that shows everything happening all at once -- which is so different from any of his other contemporaries at the time.) That old coot Will Eisner was pretty good too. But hey, I noticed didn't I?

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Richard Siegel
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 January 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 868
Posted: 11 June 2005 at 7:34am | IP Logged | 2  

Inking mushily is one thing.

Redrawing entirely is another.  Which is why aafter I did 4 pages of pencils for an unamed  Marvel book years ago and saw the inks...never again. Id rather ink my own stuff ...badly.

Then again Ive read about Vince Colleta erasing lotsa Kirby detail into limbo.

 

Ugh

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Joe Hollon
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 13680
Posted: 11 June 2005 at 7:49am | IP Logged | 3  

Holy crap!  The comparison Ed posted above is inexcusable!  JB, how can he get away with that?  Does an editor have to approve that?  I mean, c'mon they're paying you to do the pencils...Couldn't (shoudn't?) you complain about this?

Has anyone here tried inking JB's Action Comics pencils?  I'd like to see that compared to what is being passed off to us as "professional".

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Robot Wrangler

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 102266
Posted: 11 June 2005 at 8:08am | IP Logged | 4  

I mean, c'mon they're paying you to do the pencils.

****

I made that point myself, talking to Dan DiDio.
Seems rather a waste of DC's money to hire
any penciler and then have the inker change
things. We are "discussing" this.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Robot Wrangler

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 102266
Posted: 11 June 2005 at 8:11am | IP Logged | 5  

Then again Ive read about Vince Colleta erasing lotsa Kirby detail into limbo.

****

Yes, apparently Vinnie used to zip thru the books by dropping backgrounds and turning crowd scenes into silhouettes. I can't say I was ever consciously aware of this in the end result -- so I suppose it comes down to the old truism, that we the readers really have little in the way of knowing what the artist(s) intended to be on the page.

With the magic of the InterNet, at lest some of us can get the "first steps" out there to be seen, and the audience can judge for itself whether the finishd product is good, bad, or neutral.

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Andrew Hilsmann
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 844
Posted: 11 June 2005 at 8:16am | IP Logged | 6  

 John Byrne wrote:
I mean, c'mon they're paying you to do the pencils.

****

I made that point myself, talking to Dan DiDio.
Seems rather a waste of DC's money to hire
any penciler and then have the inker change
things. We are "discussing" this.


So you're unhappy with Nelson's inks, JB? Is it specific instances, or overall? Nelson is certainly a change of pace from your usual stuff. He does seem to be adding backgrounds in certain panels, but I do like the end result in many cases. I thought you were happy with the end result on the first issue, for the most part.

Edited by Andrew Hilsmann on 11 June 2005 at 8:19am
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12857
Posted: 11 June 2005 at 8:46am | IP Logged | 7  

Here's just my speculation: the editor is asking the inker to change JB's art to look more like the styles of other pencillers.  
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Bill Lukash
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1762
Posted: 11 June 2005 at 9:52am | IP Logged | 8  

I'd be sad to see Nelson go, if your speculation is correct, Joe, but I don't think we should jump the gun.  Did Nelson redraw parts of that page?  Hell yes, he (or somebody) did.  I have to be perfectly honest though, he didn't ruin it, for me, in fact, I kinda like it...as much as what JB originally drew.  I wonder if Nelson made the call to re-draw the panel or if it was an editorial decision?  And if so, why was it made?  Hell, mabye the editor wanted Repulse to be more "sassy" and less "psychotic."  I dunno.

I've been able to convince several people to pick up Action who normally wouldn't buy a Byrne book.  They basically take one look at the art and say something along the lines of "Wow, Byrne hasn't looked this good in a long time."  Since perception is often reality (sadly), I don't argue.  A few even noticed that Nelson is "overdrawing" Byrne, but not as much as Ordway did.

For the record, I like Nelson and hope he stays on for a while.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12857
Posted: 11 June 2005 at 10:01am | IP Logged | 9  

I don't think Nelson is to blame for the wholesale instances of redrawing, such as Repulse's face.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Vinny Valenti
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 8053
Posted: 11 June 2005 at 10:03am | IP Logged | 10  

It's a strange thing about Nelson - since he didn't redraw everything,
just select panels here and there, without much rhyme or reason as to which
were redrawn and which were not. In the second issue I saw panels where
JB's faces shown through and I would have figured Nelson would redraw for
sure, the last page for instance. I'm hoping the solution is to ask him to cool
it with the redrawing of faces instead of replacing him outright.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Andy Smith
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 June 2004
Posts: 503
Posted: 11 June 2005 at 10:58am | IP Logged | 11  

 Joe Hollon wrote:

Holy crap!  The comparison Ed posted above is inexcusable!  JB, how can he get away with that?  Does an editor have to approve that?  I mean, c'mon they're paying you to do the pencils...Couldn't (shoudn't?) you complain about this?

Has anyone here tried inking JB's Action Comics pencils?  I'd like to see that compared to what is being passed off to us as "professional".



If you go to the topic, inking JB's pencils ( or something like that), I posted up a Superman shot I inked from True Brit.

andy
Back to Top profile | search
 
Dave Farabee
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Quit Forum

Joined: 01 September 2004
Posts: 985
Posted: 11 June 2005 at 12:07pm | IP Logged | 12  

 Bill Lukash wrote:
I'd be sad to see Nelson go, if your speculation is correct, Joe, but I don't think we should jump the gun.  Did Nelson redraw parts of that page?  Hell yes, he (or somebody) did.  I have to be perfectly honest though, he didn't ruin it, for me, in fact, I kinda like it...as much as what JB originally drew.  I wonder if Nelson made the call to re-draw the panel or if it was an editorial decision?  And if so, why was it made?  Hell, mabye the editor wanted Repulse to be more "sassy" and less "psychotic."  I dunno.

I've been able to convince several people to pick up Action who normally wouldn't buy a Byrne book.  They basically take one look at the art and say something along the lines of "Wow, Byrne hasn't looked this good in a long time."  Since perception is often reality (sadly), I don't argue.  A few even noticed that Nelson is "overdrawing" Byrne, but not as much as Ordway did.

For the record, I like Nelson and hope he stays on for a while.

I agree with pretty much everything you posted.

And while I think it's too early to attribute brisk sales of ACTION to any one thing (Nelson's inks, Byrne back on Superman, Gail Simone devotees), I can say that it's indeed moving quite nicely at my store.

I'm very happy with it. Probably my favorite superhero book of the moment.

-Dave

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 

<< Prev Page of 7 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login