Author |
|
James Woodcock Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 21 September 2007 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 8316
|
Posted: 27 June 2011 at 1:44am | IP Logged | 1
|
post reply
|
|
Yeah but to be fair, Bob Harris did his fair share of damage during the '90's and clearly a lot of mavel planning seems to now be done by colective group discussion - hence the constant mega crossover (We are currently in the middle of a 7 part mega crossover at marvel and they are already talking about next year's). Without a doubt, I prefered the comics under Shooter's tenure but was that because of or despite of?
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
|
Stéphane Garrelie Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 05 August 2005 Location: France Posts: 4280
|
Posted: 27 June 2011 at 3:25am | IP Logged | 2
|
post reply
|
|
As said by some, with Shooter at its head Marvel was enjoyable. It is of course due to the creative teams as much if not more than to Shooter himself. And certainly Shooter didn't stay out of the way, but the point is that he obviously cared about the characters, the stories, the marvel universe and even the creators. Unlike what happens in comics today, you felt the books were about story, characters and art, not just about banking on a "franchise".
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Stéphane Garrelie Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 05 August 2005 Location: France Posts: 4280
|
Posted: 27 June 2011 at 3:36am | IP Logged | 3
|
post reply
|
|
There's of course a clear exception: Secret Wars II. But even the first Secret Wars, a series that in all logic could have been extremely commercial, a simple banking on the various characters, even this one was about story. Was Shooter a tyran with his collaborators on this one? I heard so. But the point is that we end with a quality series, maybe not perfect (but what is perfect?) maybe with some scenes that make blink a few readers (Galactus ,anyone?), but overall something well writen and well drawn, a consistant and enjoyable story. Secret Wars II on the other hand was one of the worst series ever published by Marvel. ... At that point at least. Since then Marvel took the habit to do worse than that every month.
Edited by Stéphane Garrelie on 27 June 2011 at 3:40am
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 135272
|
Posted: 27 June 2011 at 5:24am | IP Logged | 4
|
post reply
|
|
Here's the million dollar question for JB and the board. Who do you guys think was a better EIC, Quesada or Shooter?•• Which is better, being crushed under a steamroller, or trampled by elephants? These kinds of either/or questions are an exercise in futility.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Jonathan Stover Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 01 June 2004 Posts: 749
|
Posted: 27 June 2011 at 5:45am | IP Logged | 5
|
post reply
|
|
How did it develop that Marvel had an EIC and DC didn't? Or am I forgetting something about 1970's and 1980's DC compared to Marvel? Cheers, Jon
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Kevin Brown Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 31 May 2005 Location: United States Posts: 9164
|
Posted: 27 June 2011 at 6:03am | IP Logged | 6
|
post reply
|
|
Here's the million dollar question for JB and the board. Who do you guys think was a better EIC, Quesada or Shooter? *************************************** Is death an option? No? Ah well.... But I will say this: I was buying Marvel Comics when Shooter was EiC, but I have not been buying them since Quesada has been EiC. And I have more "disposable income" now than I did then.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Troy Nunis Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 4598
|
Posted: 27 June 2011 at 7:05am | IP Logged | 7
|
post reply
|
|
i would say there was a Rise and Fall to Jim Shooter as EiC - a new golden era then torn down by an unneededly heavy hand - whereas there were no high points of Quesada at all, just varying rates of decent.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
|
Don Zomberg Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 23 November 2005 Posts: 2355
|
Posted: 27 June 2011 at 7:07am | IP Logged | 8
|
post reply
|
|
Secret Wars...well written I was thirteen when that piece of turd came out, and bought it all the way up until the last issue. Couldn't have cared less how it turned out. Sometimes I wonder if a thirteen year old wrote the damn thing.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 135272
|
Posted: 27 June 2011 at 7:09am | IP Logged | 9
|
post reply
|
|
How did it develop that Marvel had an EIC and DC didn't?•• It's just differences in nomenclature.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 135272
|
Posted: 27 June 2011 at 7:14am | IP Logged | 10
|
post reply
|
|
i would say there was a Rise and Fall to Jim Shooter as EiC - a new golden era then torn down by an unneededly heavy hand - whereas there were no high points of Quesada at all, just varying rates of decent.•• When Shooter came to power at Marvel, the company was very much a stumbling giant. It needed a steady hand and a clear vision to get it back on the road, back on course. Shooter had both -- tho he was not terribly good at expressing the latter. Mostly, his way of telling us we were doing something right was when he started telling us we were doing something else wrong. To make matters worse, Shooter remained in the job long after his particular skill set was no longer needed. As I said at the time, an "ideal" situation would have been for Shooter and Dick Giordano (then EiC at DC) to swap jobs every five years or so. Quesada came into the job it was completely subservient to Marketing, virtually a figurehead position. Also, we were deep into the realm of Diminished Expectations, so it was no longer necessary to be truly successful in order to APPEAR to be successful.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Tony Midyett Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 25 January 2010 Location: United States Posts: 2834
|
Posted: 27 June 2011 at 8:27am | IP Logged | 11
|
post reply
|
|
He'd tried to do it while I was still on the book, but I had resisted -- and that was taking X-MEN further and further away from being a "specialist" book. This was the time when "mutant" became a pretty much meaningless term in the Marvel Universe.___________________________________________________________
JB, are you talking about the way Claremont started doing more and more X-Babies/Asgard Wars/mystical types of stories, rather than "hounded and hated by the humanity they've sworn to protect" types of stories? If so, I agree. It seemed that every three months one or more of the lead characters would get stripped down to his or her framework and re-built from scratch, with a new costume, new outlook, new powers, etc. It got old really fast. It was like visiting one alternate Earth after another, month after month, something that he did literally with the Excalibur series.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Rick Whiting Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 22 April 2004 Posts: 2254
|
Posted: 27 June 2011 at 8:56am | IP Logged | 12
|
post reply
|
|
Quesada came into the job it was completely subservient to Marketing, virtually a figurehead position. Also, we were deep into the realm of Diminished Expectations, so it was no longer necessary to be truly successful in order to APPEAR to be successful. __________________________________________ Which pretty much explains why the short term sales boosts due to a constant stream of sales gimmicks often directed mainly at the gullible mainstream news media and speculators among civilians. What's even sadder is that many fans wrongly credit Quesada with either "saving" or "bringing" Marvel out of bankruptcy. Then there are those Marvel editors and creators who go online to tell people that sales of the books are doing "great" by the standards of the current market. And don't get me started on those popular Marvel creators who deny that their low selling comic was canceled due to low sales, but instead was canceled because they either wanted to end the book early or because they didn't want to continue the book without the books original artist.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|