Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 25 Next >>
Topic: Jim Shooter: The Origin of the Dark Phoenix Saga Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 135187
Posted: 03 June 2011 at 11:14am | IP Logged | 1 post reply

The way the cameos of Doctor Strange, Reed and Ben, and the Silver Surfer were written in X-MEN #135 led me at the time to expect they would participate in resolving the problem of the Phoenix, somehow stopping it and freeing/rescuing Jean Grey.

+++++++++

I never got that impression. It's just a sequence were various characters who are equipped to detect the power and danger of Phoenix do just that, but then she's leaves the solar system before any of them can do anything about it.

••

The Silver Surfer is the only one who makes a specific reference to actually GOING to where Phoenix has manifest, which, based on the mail at the time, led a number of people to assume he would turn up next issue. Not at all what I wanted when I added that page.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Penn
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 April 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 13042
Posted: 03 June 2011 at 11:21am | IP Logged | 2 post reply

Like I said, Greg, I think that nothing in the art itself suggests the characters in cameo would have a part to play in the story. But the writing to me seemed to point in that direction. Those characters could not very well jump up and instantly follow Dark Phoenix at that second. But surely Doctor Strange and the Silver Surfer would have the means to find it, eventually, no matter where in the universe it ended up. And since it did return to earth, and Reed had monitored this Galactus-level entity when it left, wouldn't he be surely ready for its return?

The art since I saw it first didn't show more than several characters' coincident moment of astonishment: "huh? what in the world was THAT?!"

What's in the writing, taking what each of these characters says together, at least reasonably hints that they won't remain apart from the outcome of the story. When a character like the Silver Surfer says "I must aid her if I can," that's certainly not idle chatter!
Back to Top profile | search
 
Greg Kirkman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 15772
Posted: 03 June 2011 at 12:17pm | IP Logged | 3 post reply

I would unashamedly point to the Death of Phoenix as one of the BEST STORIES EVER DONE IN COMICS --- if only Chris had left it alone!!

But, of course, he didn't. Even during the time I was on still on the book, he slipped in every reference he could to Jean/Phoenix, whether it was appropriate or not. (The red panel Wendigo-eye-view of Nightcrawler at the end of the first part of his and Wolverine's Canadian adventure became sunset red in the captions and dialog, so Kurt could be "reminded" of Phoenix!)

++++++++++

Yeah, I noticed that when reading the next few issues after # 137. While a few moments here and there featuring the team mourning Jean shortly after her death makes sense, her death quickly because a tentpole moment that would be referred to again and again and again, like the death of Gwen Stacy.

And then came Maddie Pryor, and Jean coming back and dying again and again and again.

I'm going to make a bold statement and say that I think X-MEN essentally jumped the shark after JB left. It all became a convoluted mess right after the death of Phoenix, and largely because of that story. Maddie Pryor, Cable, Scott leaving Maddie for the real Jean, etc., etc.--it all comes back to Jean's death.

...which is a huge shame, because it really was--and still is--one of the best stories in comics, ever. I'm not big on the whole Phoenix thing, myself, but by turning things around, making her a villain, and having Jean's heroism and humanity show through at the end completely validated the somewhat ill-conceived Phoenix concept.

Also, having now read the whole classic run from # 1-137, my love for the original team is reaffirmed. The all-new, all-different stuff is fantastic--in large part because the new X-Men served as a contrast to the original team--but the core concepts and characters devised during the original run are the foundation of the X-Men universe, and it's a shame that the early stories aren't appreciated more in favor of what has now become WOLVERINE AND HIS AMAZING FRIENDS.

Wolverine was a much better character when he was the loose cannon, the crazy guy bucking authority. But he'll never be as cool to me as Cyclops, who is--or should be, at least- the core of the team. Scott and Jean were one of the power couples of the Marvel Universe--and to have Jean attracted to Wolverine or Scott banging the White Queen(!) makes me want to wretch.

The fact that the third movie killed Cyclops off-screen, and had Wolverine mercy-kill Phoenix at the end demonstrates with crystal-clarity everything that is wrong with the X-Men (and the fan/public perception of them) today.



Edited by Greg Kirkman on 03 June 2011 at 12:22pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Greg Kirkman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 15772
Posted: 03 June 2011 at 12:21pm | IP Logged | 4 post reply

What's in the writing, taking what each of these characters says together, at least reasonably hints that they won't remain apart from the outcome of the story. When a character like the Silver Surfer says "I must aid her if I can," that's certainly not idle chatter!
++++++++++++
But the very next panel shows Phoenix leaving our solar system, far beyond the Surfer's range at that time, since Galactus' barrier was still in effect, as I recall.
 
So, he voices his intent to help, but Phoenix's insane power levels propel her waaaaayyyyy out of his reach before he can contact her.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Mark Haslett
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 7045
Posted: 03 June 2011 at 12:35pm | IP Logged | 5 post reply

Greg: And then came Maddie Pryor, and Jean coming back and dying again and again and again.

***
...like a Phoenix, you might say. I haven't paid attention-- has her "phoenix" connection always explained her reappearance?

Maybe she should die and come back more often, like every other issue.
+++

Greg: The fact that the third movie killed Cyclops off-screen, and had Wolverine mercy-kill Phoenix at the end
***
Never has a spoiler made me slap my forehead so hard. Ouch.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Carmen Bernardo
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 August 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 3666
Posted: 03 June 2011 at 1:28pm | IP Logged | 6 post reply

Some personal observations on the account of Shooter's decision:

     It seems to me that when Shooter went on to decide that Jean was to be "horribly tortured for all eternity" on a prison asteroid, he really didn't take into account anything about the Shi'Ar being a million or so years more advanced than Earth.  Especially when you consider that the original resolution was to have her get a psychic lobotomy to supress the Dark Phoenix persona, whatever the X-Men might've thought of it.  Of course, this was the same alien race which gave us D'Ken and Deathbird, fought a long war with Hep'sibah's race for dominion of their home galaxy, and commanded a vast armada and the Imperial Guard.

     I'm wondering if Jim Shooter went into one of his megalomaniacal moods that I used to hear about?

Back to Top profile | search
 
Larry Morris
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 July 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 622
Posted: 03 June 2011 at 5:09pm | IP Logged | 7 post reply


 QUOTE:

 and Jean coming back and dying again and again and again.



It still irks me that this is what the character is viewed as, by so many people,  when she didn't do that for over 15 years.  Then Morrison brought it back and now she's a cariacture.  The chick who dies all the time. 
Back to Top profile | search
 
Martin Redmond
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 June 2006
Posts: 3881
Posted: 03 June 2011 at 5:29pm | IP Logged | 8 post reply

^Let's just turn our nose up and walk away at the gross ignorance in jeannieology.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 July 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 31765
Posted: 03 June 2011 at 6:01pm | IP Logged | 9 post reply

 Larry Morris wrote:
It still irks me that this is what the character is viewed as, by so many people,  when she didn't do that for over 15 years.

How many times did Phoenix appear ( or seem to appear) between UXM 137 and X-FACTOR 1? I can think of 3 just off the top of my head. It was the idea of the character that just wouldn't stay gone.

 Larry again wrote:
The chick who dies all the time.

You DO know the mythology behind the name Phoenix, right?

Back to Top profile | search
 
Larry Morris
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 July 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 622
Posted: 03 June 2011 at 7:25pm | IP Logged | 10 post reply

Gee, let me think.  Yeah, I believe I know the mythology of the Phoenix. That doesn't change the fact that, for a bunch of fans, she's the chick who dies all the time  Truth be told, she's been dead for 6 years once and the better part of 7 this time.  The deaths have been a lot more impactful then the rising from the ashes part.

Sure there were times it was mentioned post 1986.  It was a famous character in one of the series' signature stories.  At the time, it had taken Jean Grey's likeness.  The idea of it was used.  There is a big difference between that and turning Jean back into that character.

And I'll be more than happy to match my ignorance of Jean Grey, 1963-2004, that is, with anyone here.  I think I'll hold up pretty well.

 

 

 

 

Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Todd
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 September 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 4114
Posted: 06 June 2011 at 4:37am | IP Logged | 11 post reply


 QUOTE:
I did not much like the idea of doing this to one of Marvel's oldest characters (and their second female superhero!)

JB, didn't the Wasp pre-date Marvel Girl as Marvel's second Super-Heroine?



Edited by Michael Todd on 06 June 2011 at 4:44am
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 135187
Posted: 06 June 2011 at 4:52am | IP Logged | 12 post reply

JB, didn't the Wasp pre-date Marvel Girl as Marvel's second Super-Heroine?

••

Are you asking and answering your own question?

Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 25 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login