Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 170 Next >>
Topic: Healthcare Debate (was: Quesada apologizes) (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Brad Krawchuk
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 June 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 5814
Posted: 13 April 2010 at 9:55am | IP Logged | 1  

Ladies and Gentlemen, the Alphabet According to Paulo...

A, 4, 36, M, broom closet, fish patty, Communism, G, lint, Cats: The Original Broadway Cast Soundtrack, chicken fat, L, 19, aristocracy. 
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
Posted: 13 April 2010 at 10:01am | IP Logged | 2  

I don't get it, Brad.


Edited by Paulo Pereira on 13 April 2010 at 10:13am
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brad Krawchuk
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 June 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 5814
Posted: 13 April 2010 at 10:12am | IP Logged | 3  

Aw Christ, it's like Paulo has his own gravity and I keep getting sucked in. One more for the road?

Dear Paulo,

I read your post about not getting it. I agree, and thank you very much for your understanding my point. Here's some more clippings for you from government documents that don't relate to the article you posted, but that you can somehow use to prove the non-point you made. 

Sincerely,

Brad Krawchuk

Mobility Rights

Mobility of citizens

6. (1) Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada.

Rights to move and gain livelihood

(2) Every citizen of Canada and every person who has the status of a permanent resident of Canada has the right

(a) to move to and take up residence in any province; and

(b) to pursue the gaining of a livelihood in any province.


[Preamble]

The National Assembly, wishing to establish the French Constitution upon the principles it has just recognized and declared, [35] abolishes irrevocably the institutions which were injurious to liberty and equality of rights.

Neither nobility, nor peerage, nor hereditary distinctions, nor distinctions of orders, nor feudal regime, nor patrimonial courts, nor any titles, denominations, or prerogatives derived therefrom, nor any order of knighthood, nor any corporations or decorations requiring proofs of nobility or implying distinctions of birth, nor any superiority other than that of public functionaries in the performance of their duties any longer exists. [36]



Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
Posted: 13 April 2010 at 10:14am | IP Logged | 4  

Brad, I think it's you who's living in Fantasy Land. I think it's time to take the red pill.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brad Krawchuk
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 June 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 5814
Posted: 13 April 2010 at 10:30am | IP Logged | 5  

Paulo, 

Your post last page had a quote from someone that linked to an article about innocent people being detained at Guantanamo Bay.

Your response was to link to an article about an American terrorist who is helping Al-Quaeda plan attacks on American citizens, and how the government has approved killing him should they find him because he's a clear and present danger. 

You don't agree with that, so you quoted a piece from Ronald Reagan about how to handle foreign military captives, while the guy in the article you posted is neither foreign nor a captive. 

Then your quote turned out to be from Lincoln, not Reagan. Then you quote Reagan speaking on assassination, but that's to do with foreign political officials not enemy combatants. 

Paulo, your arguments don't make sense. They literally have nothing to do with one another. Nothing you've said since your initial post actually has anything to do with your initial post, either in content or in context. It's just random nonsense. You're pulling random quotes about different subjects and policies that aren't associated with the initial article, and you never even read your initial article it seems because if you did, it answers a lot of your questions. 
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Mike Benson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 January 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 851
Posted: 13 April 2010 at 10:51am | IP Logged | 6  

Works for Fox News...

Back to Top profile | search
 
Kevin Brown
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 31 May 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 9165
Posted: 13 April 2010 at 12:13pm | IP Logged | 7  

Works for Fox News...

***************************

I'm confused.....

Back to Top profile | search
 
Jodi Moisan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 6808
Posted: 13 April 2010 at 1:10pm | IP Logged | 8  

Paulo I am one of the more liberal members of this group,( outside of those across the border into Canada eh.)  But if a soldier gets a clear shot to that guys head, yes I would say "take it!" .  As I would with Osama Bin Laden.  I am more of a go after the real criminal kind of girl, instead of the let's just lob a bomb in a crowd and hope we get him kind of girl.

Would I be OK with bringing Osama to trial, yeah I would, but if some sharp shooter put a bullet through his head and I found out, I would not have one problem with it.




Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Michael Retour
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 932
Posted: 13 April 2010 at 2:14pm | IP Logged | 9  

lol liberals for the death penalty- right.  
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jeff Gillmer
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 August 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1920
Posted: 13 April 2010 at 2:24pm | IP Logged | 10  

Not fair Michael.  There are liberals that support the death penalty, as well as consertives that oppose it.  Same with abortion and gay marriage and tons of other subjects.  All this broad brush painting of people lends nothing to the discussion.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Retour
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 May 2006
Posts: 932
Posted: 13 April 2010 at 2:36pm | IP Logged | 11  

Jeff what is ironic is this: some of the same Obama fanatics derided Bush for the stuff Obama is now doing.  The NY Times piece is something I talked about where this liberal called for Obama's impeachment, partly based on his policy of murdering suspected terrorists.  
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 13 April 2010 at 2:40pm | IP Logged | 12  

Yeah, the realities of war suck and all but it has nothing to do with
capital punnishment.
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 170 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login