Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 170 Next >>
Topic: Healthcare Debate (was: Quesada apologizes) (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Brett Wilson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 April 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 318
Posted: 26 April 2010 at 6:35pm | IP Logged | 1  

Speaking of the Bushes, Noriega is going to be extradited to France.  Another former US backed dictator that managed to get on Washington's bad side.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
Posted: 26 April 2010 at 7:22pm | IP Logged | 2  

 Mike O'Brien wrote:
Well... yeah, I wouldn't want to be in the same room with the guy,but I don't think he's sinister or flat out evil, like Palin.

I don't know...a guy who stuck firecrackers into frogs as a kid doesn't seem very deserving of the benefit of the doubt.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 26 April 2010 at 8:49pm | IP Logged | 3  

oh, yeah... I forgot about that. But still - it shows his mental incompetence and utter lack of empathy as much as anything else.

But still, you have a good point.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Victor Rodgers
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 December 2004
Posts: 3508
Posted: 26 April 2010 at 11:21pm | IP Logged | 4  

Stone's movie about him made me see him in a new light. Not a bad guy,per se, just wildly innappropriate for the office of President.I do, however, think that Palin is a bad person.
******
I agree completely Mike.

I remember actually agreeing with Palin when she went after that one whit house staffer for using retard as a slur. Its a real sore point to me and I consider it as bad as throwing around nigger and faggot as an insult.

Of course within the same week she excused Rush using the term. I was relieved she was actually a hypocrite, and I was back to not being on her side about anything.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Monte Gruhlke
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3299
Posted: 27 April 2010 at 5:52pm | IP Logged | 5  

You know Victor, she'll be on your side if you pay her $100,000 speaking fee.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Kevin Brown
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 31 May 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 9104
Posted: 28 April 2010 at 6:23am | IP Logged | 6  

You know Victor, she'll be on your side if you pay her $100,000 speaking fee.

****************************

Yeah, but once the check clears, she'll go back to being all maverick-y.

Back to Top profile | search
 
William McCormick
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 February 2006
Posts: 3297
Posted: 28 April 2010 at 9:34am | IP Logged | 7  

You betcha!
Back to Top profile | search
 
Matthew McCallum
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 July 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2710
Posted: 28 April 2010 at 9:51am | IP Logged | 8  

This last bit of Obama, Dubyah and Sarah bashing spurs a quick question (two questions actually, but one for each side of the aisle):

Republicans/Conservatives: Who is the one Democrat/Liberal alive today that you can stand politically, not for the entertainment value, but if they were running in your District/State you could see yourself campaigning for them?

Democrats/Liberals: Who is the one Republican/Conservative alive today that you can stand politically, not for the entertainment value, but if they were running in your District/State you could see yourself campaigning for them?

Bonus Question for Mike O'B: I realize you've said essentially Better Dead Than Republican Red, and I appreciate and respect that. Is there anybody on the other side of the political divide that you even halfway like, not necessarily an elected official, but perhaps an author or thinker?

Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 28 April 2010 at 11:38am | IP Logged | 9  

Currently alive, no. I think Lincoln and TR and Eisenhower were all
very good politicians.

I'm also slowly warming up to Schwartzenegger, at least now that I
never have to worry about him running again. He's a decent guy and
I like his liberal social views, but I disagree with his financial policies,
and thus, could not vote for him.

I might be convinced to cut the poor loose and just deal with
financial policy that I don't agree with IF republicans cut loose their
religious zealots while on the same hand mandating that the
churches take care of the poor to keep their tax status. They'd also
have to take a better stance on social and race issues.

You know what... I start listing all these things and I realize, there is
no way I could ever support one.   I just don't believe in supporting
the rich, the powerful, the bosses, the authority. I'm a little-guy
advocate. Can't do it.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Matthew McCallum
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 July 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2710
Posted: 28 April 2010 at 12:19pm | IP Logged | 10  

Mike O'B,

Hey, the possibility of support was clearly off the table -- that's why you got the special bonus question of halfway like (which I thought might be more in the realm of possibilities).

I posed the question because earlier today I was thinking about the writers and commentators whose work I enjoy from both sides of the spectrum, and it dawned on me that they all belong to an older generation.

Among the right, I enjoy George Will (his classic Statecraft and Soulcraft, written back in his academia days, remains a favourite), Kevin Phillips, Peggy Noonan and Amity Shlaes. Among the left, I gain insight from Howard Zinn (a great loss), Jared Diamond, Paul Kennedy and John Perkins.

The new breed -- my alleged contemporaries -- are all bomb-throwers or yappers. Not much insight to be gained apart from psychoanalysis once removed...

Back to Top profile | search
 
Stephen Robinson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5833
Posted: 28 April 2010 at 1:05pm | IP Logged | 11  

I personally wish we could eliminate political parties. They exist as a means of creating a tribal climate and keep us in the perpetual campaign mode. My epiphany came during the primaries -- there was a wide range of differences of opinion among the Democratic and Republican candidates. But the uniting issue during the primaries is "I think I'm better than the other candidate but we're both better than the other party's candidates!"

Why couldn't we just have candidates of differing views together and running for office? No clubhouse. No tribal wars. No "us" vs. "them."

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
Posted: 28 April 2010 at 1:47pm | IP Logged | 12  

 Stephen wrote:
I personally wish we could eliminate political parties. They exist as a means of creating a tribal climate and keep us in the perpetual campaign mode.

Well said, if perhaps a bit too diplomatically worded.


Edited by Paulo Pereira on 28 April 2010 at 1:48pm
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 170 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login