It also depends on the issues left on the table, If the economy stays strong, Democrats will have to walk a fine line between supporting and blocking reform on immigration, Dreamers, gun control and prisons. If Republicans are smart they will give just enough concessions on parts of those issues that a majority of voters support. The optics will be Republicans compromised and Democrats caved or obstructed for political reasons. 

In my opinion, i really depends on how dumb the Repubs are in the next 2.5 years not how strong a candidate the Dems can find.

Why not give someone else a chance? 

I think his definition of ending corruption in politics & my definition are diametrically opposed.

———

Because they aren’t any better and are arguably worse?

Shouldn't it at least be time to tell the two main parties to fuck off after decades of corruption, war, etc? Why keep doing the same thing again and again?

And I speak from no moral high ground here: it's exactly the same in the UK. It's either Conservatives or Labour (the Liberal Democrats did participate in government from 2010 to 2015 due to a hung parliament), but no-one else is given a chance. So UK voters just keep swapping the red for the blue.

I have vowed I will never again vote for the "lesser of evils" and will look at all candidates. Doesn't mean I won't vote for a Republican or Democrat. We need to look beyond the labels. Not at how many Ds and Rs are in government, but about how good those particular people are.

If Alabama can do it, we all can.

Trump is the outsider, more independent type I've always wanted to win. Except he's also uninformed, a horrible speaker, and just downright embarrassing.