Posted: 27 May 2022 at 12:59am | IP Logged | 6
|
post reply
|
|
Ron Bailey wrote:
Are you going to tell me that anyone would really be swayed on an issue like this on how tasteful someone might be about the way they express themselves about the issue at yet another hopes and prayers vigil? |
|
|
According to this summary of polls, the governor's race in Texas is currently running Abbott: 48.7%, O'Rourke 38.7%.
According to this poll (from 2019, but I'm guessing attitudes probably have not changed much in the interim) 81% of Texas voters support background checks for all gun purchases. 68% of Texas voters support red flag laws. 59% support banning the sale of selected semi-automatic rifles.
So there's a notable amount of Texans who support some types of sensible gun restrictions, but do not support O'Rourke. And there's about 12% of voters who are apparently still undecided. It stands to reason those undecided are independent or moderate voters, since I can't imagine a liberal being on the fence at this point. These are the people that need to be won over if O'Rourke is going to win.
So what might win them over? I would think probably an approach like "Look, I'm a reasonable guy, and here's some reasonable ideas that would make Texas more safe. Here's some ideas a majority of Texans agree upon." Basically making the argument that "I'm not the extremist, Abbott is" on this particular issue.
Causing a scene at a news conference, expressing righteous indignation, and scolding people does not advance any of this. To the contrary, it makes it easier for Abbott to paint O'Rourke as some sort of loose cannon radical. Democrats have been chest beating, scolding, and expressing righteous indignation for the past 30 years, and it hasn't moved the needle on voters regarding this issue.
Edited by Jason Czeskleba on 27 May 2022 at 1:01am
|