| 
          
           | Posted: 08 September 2022 at 1:43am | IP Logged | 12 | post reply |  
           | 
 |  One thing is clear from the act: the United States own any Presidential records and is supposed to retain possession and control of them. 
 Upon conclusion of a President's term of office, the Archivist is supposed to assume responsibility for custody, control, preservation and access to the records for that President. 
 So I agree, Andrew, that he is not supposed to have these documents. Nor are they his possessions. This much is very clear. 
 I honestly don't see where the act covers explicitly what has happened, nor am I aware of any legal precedent on the matter. 
 This is separate to the issue of confidentiality, which is an area of which I think the details are still alleged or not entirely clear. On the face of it, as I said before, it doesn't look good. But neither, on the face of it, was Hillary's possession of classified documents on a non-secure server. The 'lock her up' argument was unpersuasive there for similar reasons to why I find it unpersuasive (as yet with the currently available information) here. 
 With the lack of precedent and the limited detail, I would be hesitant to assert a probability of prison time. 
 Speculation on Mossad assassinating him on the basis of the information available is, frankly, laughable. |