| Posted: 30 April 2008 at 1:07pm | IP Logged | 12
|
|
|
Because people don't agree with an opinion based on speculation doesn't mean that they are wrong nor that they deserve this kind of reply
******************************
Perhaps not, but when I see comments like this: But the more I hear bullshit comments like this from his supporters, the more I'm liking Clinton. The more I make comments about actually researching facts.
Also, as far as you know, I did base MY opinion on fact. I do read and go through many news sites, including CNN and Fox. I saw the comments made about Clinton crying. The prevailing sentiment was that she was more than likely faking it. I agreed.
All I'm saying is it takes is doing some reading before anyone can base an opinion on it. I did that, and I will continue to do that.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Let's change the discussion a bit -- who here thinks Obama should debate Clinton before next Tuesday. I do.
*********************************
She suggested donig a "Lincoln-Douglas" style debate. I'm all for that. However, I don't think she has an idea what that format truly is.... It's not just a debate without a moderator. The format is the current leader in votes begins and talks for an hour. The opponent responds for 90 minutes. Then the other candidate responds for 30 minutes. End of debate. In that case, it would be Obama, Clinton, Obama.
Seriously, do you think she'd really want that type of debate?
|