Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
Topic: US Presidential Election (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Wayde Murray
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 October 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 3115
Posted: 09 November 2008 at 11:18am | IP Logged | 1  

Where is the center right? That would be the average American, Joe. The representative? The McCain of 2000 was the last obvious choice to fill the role of representative at the presidential level. Someone like him will come again. Someone like him always does.


Back to Top profile | search
 
Greg Reeves
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 February 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 1396
Posted: 09 November 2008 at 11:22am | IP Logged | 2  


 QUOTE:
You guys like cowboys, and the cowboy creed is Republican gold.

You're absolutely right about this, but I count myself as one American who decidedly does not like cowboys.  I'd much rather intellectuals and academics as nation leaders (I'm sure there are intellectual cowboys, of course :-)

Back to Top profile | search
 
Scott Richards
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2005
Posts: 1258
Posted: 09 November 2008 at 11:30am | IP Logged | 3  

I'm getting pretty sick of hearing Obama won because of the crisis

Being sick of it doesn't make it untrue.  My parents were a good example.  They are both Republican and were supporting McCain and flipped and voted for Obama at the last minute when they decided to look online at their 401ks (much against my advice).  They still disagreed with his policies but they thought the stock market wouldn't turn around unless there was change.  They did it as a knee-jerk reaction and both of them, now a week later are both questioning their decision.

For good or for bad, he's now our President, regardless of how he got there so we have no choice but to support him and hope for the best.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Scott Richards
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2005
Posts: 1258
Posted: 09 November 2008 at 11:34am | IP Logged | 4  

You guys like cowboys

We'll what's not to like?  Cowboys are wicked sexy.  Those strong arms, rock hard chest, the way they fill those jeans, the way....oh wait...that's not what you meant.  Never mind.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Wayde Murray
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 October 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 3115
Posted: 09 November 2008 at 11:46am | IP Logged | 5  

And here I thought it was all about the hats and chaps. It's important to accessorize.

:-)


Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 36487
Posted: 09 November 2008 at 12:24pm | IP Logged | 6  

 Scott Richards wrote:
Being sick of it doesn't make it untrue.

And it also doesn't mean that Obama would have lost had there been no crisis.  You may think it's true.  I think it's incredibly dismissive.  No surprise, however, since I know who you supported. 

In any event, I'm glad we got a chance to see how both nominees reacted under real world pressure.  I think Obama acquitted himself like a leader whereas McCain came across as confused and staunchly towing the party line that our economic "fundamentals are sound" at a time when banks and other financial institutions were failing at a remarkable rate.  One looked presidential.  One did not.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Jodi Moisan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 6808
Posted: 09 November 2008 at 1:02pm | IP Logged | 7  

500 pages, aw it seems lke it was just yesterday it was 140 . Oh Presidential Thread you are growing up way to fast. :0)

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 36487
Posted: 09 November 2008 at 1:11pm | IP Logged | 8  

Wish I could say I was surprised...

Bush Rush To Deregulate

Back to Top profile | search
 
Wallace Sellars
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 17820
Posted: 09 November 2008 at 2:13pm | IP Logged | 9  

Wish I could say I was surprised...
---
I heard about this last week. (I think it was on NPR.) When asked about the
timing, the response was that Bush wasn't trying to rush anything through
before leaving office. I guess he just forgot about all of that stuff until now.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 09 November 2008 at 2:16pm | IP Logged | 10  

to... deregu...late... but...

This campaign has me all con-foo-sed.  Like, historically, the Republicans were all about small government and deregulation.  But then, somehow, the financial mess became the Democrats fault because the Democrats... wait... deregulated the... housing... but..  wait, wait... and then McCain and Palin said they would be the REGULATORS!  They would bring back regulation!  And...

Man, it's like they'll say anything to win an election, eh?

And Marc, Joe - no, there is nothing good or decent about Sarah Palin.  She is a horrible dark and evil thing.   She is the living breathing personification of everything that was wrong with the Republican party of the last 30 years.  As noted over the course of this thread, I didn't think McCain was such a bad guy - and had this not been a crisis year, and had he not been running against Barack Obama - if this were Hillary or something - I might have considered voting for him. 

He's a decent Republican - someone who really does put country first.

Sarah Palin is more of George W Bush, but somehow?  Less intellegent, and more vile and evil.  I know.  We thought we had hit the nadir of the fundementalist and neo-con barrell and then Karl Rove delivered this shocker to us: Sarah Palin.

The Republican party has some choices right now - they can look at everything that happened and say "Hey - we need to be actual Republicans again - let's stop pandering to religious fundementalists and the signators to the PNAC and get back to doing what's best for America, not what's best for the Church and Halliburton!"

orrrr... as some pundits (I'm looking at you, Malkin, you mouth-breathing disgrace) suggest, they could get even further in bed with those sorts - run the Republican ticket like it's a Old-Timey Revival Church sponsored by Exxon/Mobil.  Every campaign stop will feature an execution of an abortion doctor and a gay.  And when the crowd is worked into a musky lather, they'll execute the Mexican who performed the executions (at a below-Minimum Wage!)  Free candy for the kids.  Jesus says so!

Like.. sure, Palin should be interesting in the sense that it's good to see McCain's people wash their hands of the "Wasillia Hillbillies" but don't give her the kind of attention that will bring her back to any sort of position of power.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Knut Robert Knutsen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2006
Posts: 7369
Posted: 09 November 2008 at 2:36pm | IP Logged | 11  

Is America a "center right" or a "center left" country? Hm, tricky. From our perspective most of American two-party politics are firmly on the right. So it's like you take a left/right scale, drop the entire left half, then divide what's left into "left" and "right" and argue about whether you're left  or right of centre of that.

People keep going on about how Obama is "leftist", "socialist", "the most liberal democrat" etc, but from our perspective he's firmly "conservative" or "right" with some modestly liberal social views.

You might make a case for the US being "center left" according to its own historical definitions of the political "center", but in terms of european politics, you've never even set foot on the left side of the centerline (on a national scale, that is) .

Back to Top profile | search
 
Scott Richards
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2005
Posts: 1258
Posted: 09 November 2008 at 2:37pm | IP Logged | 12  

This campaign has me all con-foo-sed.  Like, historically, the Republicans were all about small government and deregulation.  But then, somehow, the financial mess became the Democrats fault because the Democrats... wait... deregulated the... housing

So you consider forcing banks to make high risk loans deregulation?
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login