Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
Topic: US Presidential Election (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Keith Elder
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1973
Posted: 01 May 2008 at 12:41pm | IP Logged | 1  

I suppose that would mean we usually can't talk about women, either, unless Jodi pops into the thread.  No more discussing Hillary Clinton, please.

What about Irishmen?  Do we need to have one of them present to discuss Ireland?  I think we should, in order to really consider ourselves impeccably respectful.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 01 May 2008 at 12:44pm | IP Logged | 2  

Yeah, I don't think that was Obama's point when he said he didn't hear such things - it's the only thing I don't like about his campaign so far - that he pulled a Clinton and parsed it, but he was saying, you know, he didn't hear the "god damn america" and the 9/11 and AIDS stuff - he wasn't there for that particular speach, but early on, he admitted he knew there was whacked out speaches. 

So, this guy's reputation is being tarnished not because of things he said or did, but about assumptions made about him and repeated in the media, on-line, etc.

Nice!  Stay classy, America!

And, yes, yes, Thom, Christopher, I'm as guilty as everyone else here - I'm presuming to have some insight to the black experience that, as an outsider, I can never have, and looking at my own words, I realized this was spiraling out of control.

Christopher - oh, believe me you, I do talk about you all the time behind your back.  But understand, when I'm discussing your thoughts and feelings, my statements have no facts or validity behind them, and are just the rantings of an ignorant boob.  Because I am not you, and I have no idea what your thoughts and feelings are.  I can make educated guesses based on your statements here on the JBF, but I'm sure you'll agree, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a detailed report of your actual thoughts, feelings, etc, and thus, my comments as such would be meaningless and trivial.

WHICH, by the way, is my point - how does our lilly-white expert opinion on the black experience have any meaning in this conversation?  Why don't we talk about the price of apples in Ecuador - it's just as relevent...

Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 01 May 2008 at 12:47pm | IP Logged | 3  

No, Keith, I didn't say we can't discuss blacks - I'm saying that we're not in a legitimate position to describe how certain people, whose experience is totally different from ours, think, feel and believe.

Lots of people missing my point - am I being unclear?

Back to Top profile | search
 
Thom Price
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
L’Homme Diabolique

Joined: 29 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 7592
Posted: 01 May 2008 at 12:48pm | IP Logged | 4  

When did we all become experts on the black experience?

***

I've never pretended to be, and my point had nothing what so ever to do with the "black experience."  The point that I disagree with is that no one from the church would consider Wright's comments worthy of discussion or gossip simply because they're black and they "get it."  It's human nature to discuss and gossip about things that are controversial, passionate, or unusual -- and that human nature trumps the racial profiling that's been going on in this thread.  If you think that an entire group of people would dismiss or disregard Wright's comments simply because they share his skin color, you're the one presenting himself as an expert on the black experience.
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Michael Roberts
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 14890
Posted: 01 May 2008 at 12:49pm | IP Logged | 5  

In that light, yeah, I find it a specious argument that Obama wasn't privy to
the knowledge of what Wright was preaching over two decades as a member
of that congregation, either by being present at the time of a sermon or
hearing about it from other members of the congregation. Some in this
thread would say that it's not beyond the bounds of reason that he didn't
know what Wright was saying. I find that to be poppycock.

That was my point.

---

And from my own life experiences, I think you are wrong, Matt.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Roberts
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 14890
Posted: 01 May 2008 at 12:52pm | IP Logged | 6  

The point that I disagree with is that no one from the church would consider
Wright's comments worthy of discussion or gossip simply because they're
black and they "get it." It's human nature to discuss and gossip about things
that are controversial, passionate, or unusual -- and that human nature
trumps the racial profiling that's been going on in this thread.

---

And I think that's the point you are missing. I don't think Wright's
statements were necessarily "controversial, passionate, or unusual". Which is
not to say people agreed with them. But the comments are what they are.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 36443
Posted: 01 May 2008 at 12:56pm | IP Logged | 7  

 Michael Roberts wrote:
And from my own life experiences, I think you are wrong, Matt.

Fair enough.  Whatever your experience is, it's certainly different from mine.  I grew up in the church in the home of a pastor, my father.  I'm pretty intimately aware of how much gossiping goes on in the church.  I'd posit that more gossiping goes on in the church, any church, than just about anywhere else.  It certainly rivals the gossiping that goes on at high school or among co-workers.  From that light, certainly anecdotal, I find it hard to believe that no gossiping, no talking about, a pastor's sermon ever reached the ears of Obama in two decades.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Thom Price
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
L’Homme Diabolique

Joined: 29 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 7592
Posted: 01 May 2008 at 12:59pm | IP Logged | 8  

I don't think Wright's statements were necessarily "controversial, passionate, or unusual". Which is not to say people agreed with them. But the comments are what they are.

***


Which is funny, because Obama himself has referred to Wright's comments as controversial and offensive.  So you're telling me that if Obama had been there, he's the only out of the entire congregation who would have had that reaction?  Nonsense. 
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Bruce Buchanan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 June 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 4797
Posted: 01 May 2008 at 1:05pm | IP Logged | 9  

When did we all become experts on the black experience?

***********

Mike, I'd agree that the relevance of Obama's relationship with Wright has been blown out of proportion. I'd hate to be held accountable for every one I've ever known.

Having said that, asking questions about their relationship is entirely appropriate, no matter if they are white, black, red or purple. I don't see how race even factors into it. Obama is running for President. Every serious contender for president opens their entire life up to scrutiny. They know that going in.

Before the 2000 election, George Bush's 30-year-old drunken driving arrest became a big topic of public conversation. Was that fair game for debate? Of course it was. He chose to run for president, knowing that made his entire life an open book.

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Michael Roberts
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 14890
Posted: 01 May 2008 at 1:11pm | IP Logged | 10  

Which is funny, because Obama himself has referred to Wright's comments
as controversial and offensive. So you're telling me that if Obama had been
there, he's the only out of the entire congregation who would have had that
reaction? Nonsense.

---

No, that's not what I'm telling you. There are lots of sentiments that people
express in front of me that I don't think they'd express in front of white
people. Do I find them offensive and disagree with them? Yes. Do I find
these sentiments shocking or unexpected? No.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Al Cook
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 December 2004
Posts: 12735
Posted: 01 May 2008 at 1:18pm | IP Logged | 11  

Fellow PK here, Matt, and I agree. I can't imagine how Obama wouldn't have
heard about Wright's views. I can, however, imagine how Obama could
disagree with them and still be comfortable with having the man as his
pastor.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Roberts
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 14890
Posted: 01 May 2008 at 1:21pm | IP Logged | 12  

PK = Preacher's Kid?
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login