Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
Topic: US Presidential Election (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Geoff Gibson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5744
Posted: 09 May 2008 at 9:47am | IP Logged | 1  

I thought the quote that you quoted was referring to a literal 3rd Bush term and not commentary on McCain.

I may have misinterpreted the comment if so, sorry Scott.  But I did hear Obama say "a third Bush Term" the other night and he was clearly using that short hand.  I get why its done (politically its very smart) but I just don't like it.  I think it disingenous. 

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 09 May 2008 at 10:16am | IP Logged | 2  

That's a whole lot more than a "few"

Ah, but it's a lot less than a majority of his votes, and thus, you can still make a judgement based on his voting record.

Scott, are you even trying?

Back to Top profile | search
 
Jason Czeskleba
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 April 2004
Posts: 4636
Posted: 09 May 2008 at 11:53am | IP Logged | 3  

 Scott Richards wrote:
Obama makes poor (or no) choices and has poor judgement.  The thing that turned me completely against Obama, to the point of prefering a 3rd Bush term, was the whole Rev. Wright thing.


The Wright thing is indicative of poor political judgment on Obama's part (ie, poor judgment about what it takes to win a political campaign).  That doesn't necessarily translate into poor judgment in the area of policy ideas and decisions.  Bill Clinton showed very poor judgment in deciding to get blowjobs from his intern, yet that didn't mean he also had poor judgment in his Presidential decisions.  Similarly, George Bush has (at least since becoming sober) shown very good judgment in his personal life, yet that hasn't prevented him from having extremely poor judgment in several major policy decisions.

Which of the three candidates showed the best judgment in 2002 regarding the possible outcomes and consequences of the Iraq War?  I think things like that speak more accurately as to what type of judgment Obama would have as President than the pastor thing does.

At any rate, if you want that one thing to be what makes your decision, that's your choice.  But I still don't see any evidence that Obama is substantially more liberal than Clinton. 


Edited by Jason Czeskleba on 09 May 2008 at 11:54am
Back to Top profile | search
 
Al Cook
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 December 2004
Posts: 12735
Posted: 09 May 2008 at 12:12pm | IP Logged | 4  

There are those that plain old do not want to like Obama, and cling to
anything they can to justify that to themselvess.

Using the Wright thing as the turning point strikes me as more of a straw
being clutched at than one breaking a camel's back.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 09 May 2008 at 12:13pm | IP Logged | 5  

Nor, that he is socialist, or that Wright's sermons have ever, in any way, affected Obama's actions in office.

I've thrown out those challenges a few times in this thread, and there's been no replies.

My excitement for Obama has been openly mocked, but look - I've gone on record here a few times saying I'm not happy with certain things about his campaign and how he's not the god that people make him out to be - if someione has a good intellegent compelling reason why he's not fit for office, I'm all ears.

So far it's just really embarassingly naive parroting of sound-bites about some irrelevant preacher or outright lies about his voting record and intentions.

Try harder, guys.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Geoff Gibson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5744
Posted: 09 May 2008 at 12:34pm | IP Logged | 6  

 Bill Clinton showed very poor judgment in deciding to get blowjobs from his intern, yet that didn't mean he also had poor judgment in his Presidential decisions.

That wasn't the poor judgment Clinton showed.  Lying under oath was the poor judgment.  For me the issue was never sex -- it was a conscious decision to lie under oath.  It matters not a whit that the reason he was being deposed was bullshit.  He was the chief executive -- effectively the top law enforcement officer in the land -- and he chose to perjure himself.  Whats really sad is that it was civil deposition -- he could have simply refused to answer the question -- but his political mind told him to lie.  That was where he used excessively poor judgment.  We all lie -- we don't all commit perjury.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Kevin Hagerman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 April 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 18273
Posted: 09 May 2008 at 12:51pm | IP Logged | 7  

Thanks to the hard work of our media (come on, Kevin, you can do this without laughing) we have uncovered 8500 people (that's the size of Wright's congregation) who some idiots think might as well be shipped down to Gitmo.

God bless America.

 

 

edit: I either typoed or I just mis-spelled MY OWN NAME.  This Wright business pisses me off so much I don't know which is the case right now.



Edited by Kevin Hagerman on 09 May 2008 at 12:52pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Scott Richards
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2005
Posts: 1258
Posted: 09 May 2008 at 12:53pm | IP Logged | 8  

This isn't directed to Scott -- it just a general statement.  I get tired of seeing that statement because I think its unfair.  I think its really just politicized bullshit.  McCain's first term will not be Bush's third term.  That is political spin. 

I realize you weren't directing this at me, but I wasn't in any way equating McCain to Bush.  I meant I would almost prefer to literally have Congress change it to allow Bush a 3rd term and have Bush win.  I didn't mean it as political spin with McCain.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Geoff Gibson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5744
Posted: 09 May 2008 at 12:54pm | IP Logged | 9  

Breath Kevin, breath.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Scott Richards
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2005
Posts: 1258
Posted: 09 May 2008 at 12:58pm | IP Logged | 10  

That's a whole lot more than a "few"

Ah, but it's a lot less than a majority of his votes, and thus, you can still make a judgement based on his voting record.

Scott, are you even trying?

Trying?  I went out and saw that he abstained nearly 40% of the time.  You call that anything close to acceptable?  Abstaining well over a third of the time is acceptable?  Not doing your job nearly 40% of the time is acceptable?

When you ask about really trying I think you should reflect on yourself first.  Because if "Scott, are you even trying" was meant to be a legitimate response to his voting record, it was sorely lacking.  If abstaining nearly 40% of the time is acceptable to you, you've opened my eyes as to why you want Obama.  You have low standards. 



Edited by Scott Richards on 09 May 2008 at 1:08pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Joel Tesch
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 2834
Posted: 09 May 2008 at 1:02pm | IP Logged | 11  

"both parties are guilty of using that phrase."

Exactly...BOTH parties play hardball. They love to paint the other ones as the bad guys ("The Republicans use such dirty tactics!" "Another Democrat trick!") but they are both the same in that they'll do anything to get elected.

Case in point: Hilary's reference yesterday to being more popular with the "white" voters.  Pretty soon she'll be running the Willie Horton ad spot.



Edited by Joel Tesch on 09 May 2008 at 1:03pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Joel Tesch
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 2834
Posted: 09 May 2008 at 1:05pm | IP Logged | 12  

Scott, Hey, if you don't like Obama, then the fact that he abstained 40% of the time should be a good thing! :-)

(All this talk of abstaining...there's GOT to be a good Bill Clinton joke in there somewhere!)

Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login