Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
Topic: US Presidential Election (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Keith Elder
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1973
Posted: 15 May 2008 at 6:00pm | IP Logged | 1  

You want to negotiate up to a point, and not negotiate past a point, but that point isn't always very clear until you look back after the war is over.

There should always be an attempt to understand each other, though; even if it's just to help you kill the other person more efficiently.  And some sort of diplomatic channel needs to always be kept open; there's a difference between leaving communication paths open, and appeasement.  We always negotiated with the U.S.S.R., even during the worst of the cold war.

Once at work, a woman handed me a stack of papers, and I said "Thanks, Doll."  It was purely out of habit, because that was what I was calling my girlfriend's little daughter at the time.  Thankfully, nobody heard me.  Conversely, I get called Darlin' or Sweetie all the time by the (usually older) ladies here, and nobody cares.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
David Ferguson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 March 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 6782
Posted: 15 May 2008 at 6:04pm | IP Logged | 2  

I'm sorry but I don't see the whole "hating America's freedoms" arguement. There are plenty of countries with as much or more freedoms that the US that OBL didn't attack. I think its more hating the US' Foreign Policy.
Back to Top profile | search
 
David Ferguson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 March 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 6782
Posted: 15 May 2008 at 6:06pm | IP Logged | 3  

We always negotiated with the U.S.S.R., even during the worst of the cold war.

*****

Good point. There can always be at least diplomaic back channels open where you don't negotiate directly but use a neutral third party.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Kevin Hagerman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 April 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 18272
Posted: 15 May 2008 at 6:13pm | IP Logged | 4  

I'm sorry but I don't see the whole "hating America's freedoms" arguement. There are plenty of countries with as much or more freedoms that the US that OBL didn't attack. I think its more hating the US' Foreign Policy.
-----------------------------------------------------

Guess which statement gets you the highest approval rating in history?

I was on the fence re: Bush until the State of the Union 2002.  Worst thing I ever saw on TV.  9/11 was done to us; 1/28 and the Axis of Evil?  We did that shit to ourselves.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Christopher Alan Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 October 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2787
Posted: 15 May 2008 at 6:26pm | IP Logged | 5  

Do you not believe those three countries were our enemies or is it that you didn't see them as linked together?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 15 May 2008 at 6:30pm | IP Logged | 6  

Agreed, Kieth!  One notes the irony of the criticism of Obama - he's a spineless wimp for wanting to talk to various world leaders, but a psychopath for wanting to go into Pakinstan... to get OBL of all things!

Boy, ya can't win!

Back to Top profile | search
 
Kevin Hagerman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 April 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 18272
Posted: 15 May 2008 at 7:02pm | IP Logged | 7  

Do you not believe those three countries were our enemies or is it that you didn't see them as linked together?

----------------------------------------------------

A little from column A and a LOT from column B.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Christopher Alan Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 October 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2787
Posted: 15 May 2008 at 7:22pm | IP Logged | 8  

You have a point on the axis part. Iraq and Iran were enemies not allies. North Korea sells missile technoogly to Iran but they'll sell it to anyone with the cash. it's not that much of a link.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Joel Tesch
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 2834
Posted: 15 May 2008 at 7:47pm | IP Logged | 9  

I don't remember the "Axis of Evil" ever being an argument that the three were linked...just that those were our three main enemies that we were going to have to deal with. The US's "Rogues Gallery" if you will.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Kevin Hagerman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 April 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 18272
Posted: 15 May 2008 at 7:50pm | IP Logged | 10  

...stuck together in an "Axis" to ratchet up the Fear Factor.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Roberts
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 14890
Posted: 15 May 2008 at 10:16pm | IP Logged | 11  

I don't remember the "Axis of Evil" ever being an argument that the three
were linked...

---

If "Axis" wasn't meant as an allusion to the WWII alliance of Nazi Germany,
Imperial Japan, and Fascist Italy, I'm curious as to the intended context.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mike O'Brien
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Official JB Historian

Joined: 18 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10927
Posted: 15 May 2008 at 10:22pm | IP Logged | 12  

Well, I thought "Axis" implied the link.

I've been known to make inncorrect assumptions, and Bush is known to be a grade-A idiot, so, factor both of those in.

Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login