| Posted: 05 June 2008 at 1:18pm | IP Logged | 3
|
|
|
By who's standards? What do I care if someone thinks I'm wrong if I think it protects my child? I'm telling you guys my reasons, but I'm not looking for justification. See, this is what I was alluding to: blanket statements of what's right or wrong sound great in the comic book world, but in real life we have to profile or show prejudice if we want to be safe. You greatly run the risk of injury or death if you decide to live your life without some amount of prejudice.
Greg:
No one is saying you are not entitled to believe what you believe. But if some questions your statements -- based on what you have previously stated -- you should not be surprised or, frankly, offended.
As to this statement: in real life we have to profile or show prejudice if we want to be safe. You greatly run the risk of injury or death if you decide to live your life without some amount of prejudice.
This is the argument for profiling based on race. This is the argument for warrentless wiretapping. I don't accept it or agree, but I understand it.
For one thing, who decides the fine line between choosing something because you want it from not choosing something because you don't want it? Prejudice is prejudice; certainly it's more important to consider prejudice against race than the brand of an appliance, but you're still refusing to do or buy something because it isn't good enough for you.
Prejudice based on race is not rejecting someone because of their qualities. It is rejecting someone before their qualites are even considered. Choosing one car over another, or one school over another is made because you have considered the respective qualities.
By the way, I think we should include class in your definition of prejudice. I don't care what the color of the skin or the sexual orientation is nearly as much as I care whether a person behaves or presents themselves appropriately.
Whose definiton of class. Do you mean economic class?
|