Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
Topic: US Presidential Election (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
Posted: 05 June 2008 at 3:06pm | IP Logged | 1  


 QUOTE:
"Thus your "extra skepticism" towards him can onlly be construed as prejudice."

No.

Yes.  You are singling out one guy over the other. 

Back to Top profile | search
 
Jodi Moisan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 6808
Posted: 05 June 2008 at 3:07pm | IP Logged | 2  

Do you know the scout master? Do you trust him? What do you know of the friend?  If the answer to those questions is no or nothing, then please don't send your son on a trip with him.  But if the answer is yes, and the Scoutmaster takes responsibility for your son and promises to protect him and you trust him, I'd say go enjoy Knoxville. 

Where have I articulated lax parental responsibilities?

Oh with you it's great parenting, to me and Greg it's prejudice.



Edited by Jodi Moisan on 05 June 2008 at 3:07pm
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Michael Roberts
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 14890
Posted: 05 June 2008 at 3:08pm | IP Logged | 3  

Michael are you saying you wouldn't let him go? Isn't that predjudice??????

---

No, I'm saying it would depend how well you knew the person. If you knew
the scout leader well and trusted him, it should not matter if he has kids of
his own or not, and you can use your own judgment whether or not to let
him go. If you don't know him well, you shouldn't be making your judgment
based on whether he has kids of his own or not.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jodi Moisan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 6808
Posted: 05 June 2008 at 3:09pm | IP Logged | 4  

Todd: Not verbatim, no.

EXACTLY

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Todd Douglas
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 July 2004
Posts: 4101
Posted: 05 June 2008 at 3:09pm | IP Logged | 5  

I'm pretty much on the same page as Geoff.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Geoff Gibson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5744
Posted: 05 June 2008 at 3:09pm | IP Logged | 6  

I added this before I saw your response Jodie, mea culpa:

All along I've said anyone (regardless of gender) who your kid deals with you should know and trust.  But I don't distrust a man more than a woman simply because of his gender.  Based on your posts you do, Jodie.

The bold is the prejudice.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Todd Douglas
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 July 2004
Posts: 4101
Posted: 05 June 2008 at 3:10pm | IP Logged | 7  

And yet that interpretation meshes perfectly with your words that WERE verbatim.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Geoff Gibson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5744
Posted: 05 June 2008 at 3:10pm | IP Logged | 8  

Oh with you it's great parenting, to me and Greg it's prejudice.

I am confused please explain.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Michael Roberts
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 14890
Posted: 05 June 2008 at 3:12pm | IP Logged | 9  

Oh with you it's great parenting, to me and Greg it's prejudice.

---

Jodi, pretty much all the people that have been arguing with Greg on this
and the other thread are explicitly not saying that parents shouldn't
scrutinize adults who are alone with their children. What they ARE saying is
that it is unreasonable to use the criterion of whether or not a man has
children of his own as a factor in their scrutiny. Do you not understand the
distinction?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Geoff Gibson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5744
Posted: 05 June 2008 at 3:12pm | IP Logged | 10  

To reiterate from page 107 my comments:

Understand -- I am not articulating a a disregard for who spends time with children.  You better believe that I make certain that anyone around my daughters is someone my wife and I agree will do them no harm.  I am simply stating that default prejudice against men is unfair and indistinguishable from other kinds of profiling.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Donald Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 February 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 3601
Posted: 05 June 2008 at 3:13pm | IP Logged | 11  

Jodie,
Don't let him go, I know that man...he doesn't wear a helmet when he shreds, and that is simply not cool....

D-
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Jodi Moisan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 6808
Posted: 05 June 2008 at 3:13pm | IP Logged | 12  

Do I think women are more trustworthy, concerning molestation then men. Yes I will agree with that statement.

Back to Top profile | search | www
 

<< Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login