Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
Topic: US Presidential Election (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Greg Reeves
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 February 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 1396
Posted: 08 August 2008 at 7:44am | IP Logged | 1  

I was watching some of the speculation yesterday about Hillary's intent at the Democratic convention; apparently, she wants to allow all of her supporters to formally nominate her at the convention to "let their voices be heard".  At first I thought, b!tch, would you give it up?  It's over.  Then I thought perhaps this is a smart way to get her millions of supporters to move over to Obama, by first allowing them to officially declare who they want; then when the number isn't enough for her to be the nominee, she can ask them to help her support Obama.  At least, I hope that's the plan, because there is a considerable number of women voters who would rather have McCain than a Democratic candidate who defeated their beloved Hillary...
Back to Top profile | search
 
Scott Richards
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2005
Posts: 1258
Posted: 08 August 2008 at 8:29am | IP Logged | 2  

I think Obama will need to have at a bare minimum, a 15% lead in all the polls to have a shot of beating McCain.

On the way to work this morning they were talking about how the polls may currently be skewed by people who are not supporting Obama, but don't want to appear to be racist.  When asked face to face or on the phone by a pollster, they say they are voting for Obama just so they don't appear to be racist.

Obviously there are going to be people who do that, but I didn't think it would be a significant percentage of people.  They pointed out a straw poll that AOL news does online each week where no pollster is involved.  Currently, for the poll running from August 4 to August 11, with 86,032 responses Obama has 30% compared to McCain's 70%.

http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/08/05/aol-straw-p oll-aug-4-11

Now it will really be interesting once they add the 3rd party candidates to the poll.



Edited by Scott Richards on 08 August 2008 at 8:31am
Back to Top profile | search
 
Thom Price
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
L’Homme Diabolique

Joined: 29 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 7592
Posted: 08 August 2008 at 9:32am | IP Logged | 3  

I've all but tuned out of the election at this time; frankly, I'm sick of hearing about both of them already.  But every so often a few news article or opinion piece will catch my eye.  I found it interesting that the last few I read were asking essentially the same question:  why, in a year when any Democrat should be trouncing any Republican in the polls, are Obama's numbers still largely within the margin of error?  It seems a lot of the Liberal pundits are starting to worry.


 QUOTE:
The bottom line: liberal pundits — following months of analysis by their conservative counterparts — had figured out that despite the best possible terrain for the Democrats to recapture the White House, the Democrats (with a whole lot of cheerleading from the mainstream media) have chosen a thinly experienced, irresolute, underachieving and obnoxious standard bearer. And his excuse-mongering just makes it all the more irritating.

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/pundits-begin-to-worry-about-ob ama/

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12843
Posted: 08 August 2008 at 9:41am | IP Logged | 4  

Online polls ... now those are reliable.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Scott Richards
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2005
Posts: 1258
Posted: 08 August 2008 at 11:47am | IP Logged | 5  

Online polls ... now those are reliable.

I agree.  It lets people give an honest answer without worrying what the person on the other end of the microphone/telephone thinks or where they are being interrupted by someone to take the poll.  At least online, the person isn't being intruded upon and this poll ise set up to prevent ballot box stuffing via automated programs and IP addresses.



Edited by Scott Richards on 08 August 2008 at 11:49am
Back to Top profile | search
 
Al Cook
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 December 2004
Posts: 12735
Posted: 08 August 2008 at 11:57am | IP Logged | 6  

Sure, because (for example) an online poll at FoxNews.com is going to
attract a wide variety of views and opinions.

Come on, you're not really that naive, are you Scott?

There is no such thing as a poll that can be trusted.

The proof is, as they say, in the pudding. The results of the election itself.

(Of course, now you have electronic voting booths that make rigging even
those results that much easier...)
Back to Top profile | search
 
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12843
Posted: 08 August 2008 at 12:08pm | IP Logged | 7  

Scott, this idea that people say that they're voting for Obama because they're afraid the pollster would think they're racist is stupid.

I've lived in America on and off for most of thirty-six years. The folks who give me a tough time because I'm not the same race as they are, those guys are never shy about letting me know why.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Scott Richards
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2005
Posts: 1258
Posted: 08 August 2008 at 1:50pm | IP Logged | 8  

Joe, I'm talking about peope who are not racist who fear being perceived as racist simply because they disagree with the politics of a candidate.  I'm not talking about people are actually racist and vocal about it.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Geoff Gibson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5744
Posted: 13 August 2008 at 8:26am | IP Logged | 9  

To keep the thread alive and because its interesting reading here's Maureen Dowd on the Clinton's theft of the Democratic Convention and Tom Friedman's condemnation of John McCain (and to a lesser extent Barak Obama) for failing to vote on the continuation of tax credits for renewable energy source investments.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Sam Karns
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 December 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 7624
Posted: 13 August 2008 at 11:00am | IP Logged | 10  

I'm not interested in any of the candidates.  I'm hoping their running mates will be less generic than they are.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Scott Richards
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2005
Posts: 1258
Posted: 13 August 2008 at 2:28pm | IP Logged | 11  

I heard something very interesting on the radio that made me do a double take.  Rumor is McCain is mulling over Lieberman as a running mate.  It seems odd.  Has there every been a split ticket like that in recent years?  I know that's how it was in the beginning but I don't think that's occurred in the last century at all.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Christopher Alan Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 October 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2787
Posted: 13 August 2008 at 2:31pm | IP Logged | 12  

Lincoln and Johnson was the only time it happened as far as I know. I can't see it happening now. People talked about Kerry running with McCain in 2004. It was an absurd idea.
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login