Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
Topic: US Presidential Election (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Bob Neill
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 December 2007
Posts: 877
Posted: 23 August 2008 at 1:33pm | IP Logged | 1  

Marc Baptiste wrote:
A 37-year old, gay, liberal, San Francisco Bay Area lifelong "blue-dog" Democrat now has to do some serious thinking about whether or not to pull the lever for Obama in November.

Jason C:


 QUOTE:
May I ask why?  Biden is an uninspiring choice, certainly.  A bland choice that's likely to add nothing to the ticket and may even detract from it.  But I really can't imagine why anyone who describes themself as a Democrat would contemplate not voting and/or voting for McCain.  Doesn't the prospect of a McCain Presidency concern you? 

I'm not saying this is your rationale, but it seems like too many Democrats have the idea that if the candidate is not perfect, or does not perfectly echo their own personal views, they do not want to support them.  Republicans seem to better grasp the concept of uniting around the person who most closely resembles their views, even if he is seriously flawed in some areas

Agreed. This, moreso than Republicans stealing the vote', is what has killed the Dems in the last two elections.

Kevin H:


 QUOTE:

I have long noticed this and I have a bumper-sticker sized summary: Democrats are strugglers, Republicans are winners.

Some would change 'strugglers' to 'whiners', just for the sake of a catchier bumper-sticker slogan.


 QUOTE:
I'd say Jason's description is accurate, which also encapsulates my disgust at
the modern Republican party. Over the last two decades, I have watched the
Republicans steadily deteriorate into a party that doesn't seem to care who
gets elected, as long as they're under the Republican ticket.

In other words, uniting around someone you know to be seriously flawed is,
in my view, an inherently bad thing.

A very good argument can be made that the Democrats feel the same way.

The Democrats just don't bring much more to the table than 'America is fuctup unless we're in the White House'-style rhetoric. 

 

 



Edited by Bob Neill on 23 August 2008 at 1:34pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Bob Neill
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 December 2007
Posts: 877
Posted: 23 August 2008 at 1:36pm | IP Logged | 2  

Ray Brady:


 QUOTE:
Doesn't neither. I have the right to complain about whatever I want,
whenever I want. Just try to stop me.

Hello, 'Ignore' button...

Back to Top profile | search
 
Thom Price
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
L’Homme Diabolique

Joined: 29 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 7592
Posted: 23 August 2008 at 3:00pm | IP Logged | 3  

In other words, uniting around someone you know to be seriously flawed is,
in my view, an inherently bad thing.

***

Agreed.  I grimaced, and voted for Gore.  I held my nose, and voted for Kerry.  This "vote for whatever loser we chuck your way just because you kind-sorta agree with his politics" is getting old.  The Democrats should have been able to sleep-walk to the White House this year, and yet they chose a candidate who brings nothing to the table except bland, empty rhetoric about "change" -- and even that he's backing away from.

My choice this year is coming down to a candidate that I kind of like, but whose politics I disgree with and a candidate who I vaguely agree with but I think will be a lousy President.  Some choice.  I'll be looking very closely at the 3rd party candidates in the coming months.

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Ray Brady
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3737
Posted: 23 August 2008 at 3:34pm | IP Logged | 4  

"A very good argument can be made that the Democrats feel the same way."
-----
It could indeed. But it would not be consistent with Jason's point that
Democrats won't support a candidate who does not perfectly reflect their
ideology, and that was the point I was addressing.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
David Ferguson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 March 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 6782
Posted: 23 August 2008 at 3:46pm | IP Logged | 5  

We all have 'the right not to vote'..

******

Over here, its supposed to be an obligation.

I'd be more inclined if it was like Germany where you can vote AGAINST someone.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Marc Baptiste
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3633
Posted: 23 August 2008 at 7:44pm | IP Logged | 6  

Bob,

You are getting your right to vote and right to free speech mixed up.  Constitutional Law 101?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Scott Richards
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2005
Posts: 1258
Posted: 23 August 2008 at 8:27pm | IP Logged | 7  

Hey, I still think we should go back to the old style, where the loser
becomes Veep.

That would mean we had 2 VPs and no President then.  I think they both qualify as losers.  :P

Back to Top profile | search
 
Geoff Gibson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5744
Posted: 23 August 2008 at 8:29pm | IP Logged | 8  

Arguably, and certainly historically, free speech rights are more stringently
protected than the right to vote!
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Scott Richards
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2005
Posts: 1258
Posted: 23 August 2008 at 8:33pm | IP Logged | 9  

Well, if it's Biden, that frees up McCain to pick Romney.  The suck would be about equal.  The only way he could do worse is Leiberman. 

IMO, Lieberman would make it a slam dunk for McCain.  All they would have to do change the direction of the campaign to something like "Vote for Real Change" and then promote the ticket as non-partisan.  They'd just play up Lieberman's Democratic contacts/pull and McCain's Republican contacts/pull saying they could get things done in a non-partisan way.

It would completely deflate Obama's entire message of change (especially after picking Biden).  The really conservative Republicans have already been alienated so it's not going to hurt in that regard.  He can't lose what he didn't have in the first place. 

What it would do is pull moderate Democrats and moderate undecided voters over to McCain/Lieberman in big numbers.  At least that's how I see it.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Joel Tesch
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 2834
Posted: 23 August 2008 at 8:38pm | IP Logged | 10  

The really conservative Republicans have already been alienated so it's not going to hurt in that regard.  He can't lose what he didn't have in the first place. 

Plus, a lot of Republicans really like Lieberman.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Marc Baptiste
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3633
Posted: 23 August 2008 at 9:09pm | IP Logged | 11  

Geoff,

Hold me!!!
Back to Top profile | search
 
Christopher Alan Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 October 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2787
Posted: 23 August 2008 at 11:42pm | IP Logged | 12  

NIce job by Obama saying a tornado killed 10,000 people in Kansas. Introducing Biden as the next President of the United States was pretty good too.

 

Oops. The tornado thing was from last year. I must've missed it. Still a good one.



Edited by Christopher Alan Miller on 23 August 2008 at 11:47pm
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 1093 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login