| Posted: 05 October 2008 at 2:48pm | IP Logged | 11
|
|
|
Jeez, Thomas, that's interesting... because if you read the congressional record, when it died in committee, (because of how the bill worked - privitizing Fannie and Freddie, not because they wanted the economy to crash) it did so with a recomendation that the bill be brought up again, which is was, the next session.
Look - to all of you who are stuck on this talking point - the facts don't back it up. I know where you're coming from - where I live, the only talk radio options are right wing, so I'm hearing these marching orders being given everyday - I get that the message is supposed to be the R's tried to save this and D's stopped them, but the facts just do not back that up.
To be spreading this sort of story involves a misunderstanding of how congress works.
In this case, both parties introduced bills and the opposite party was opposed because the bills had fundemental party lines in them. Why would the dems support a bill that pushed for Freddy and Fannie to be privatized? That's not the Dem party line. Likewise, why would the Repubs sign off on something that pushed for regulation? That's not their party line.
Some clever soul who knew that "Joe Sixpack" doesn't have a working understanding of how Congress works and wouldn't take the time to check the facts, grabbed the bill the Republicans were working on, falsely claimed that McCain had something to do with it, (aside from slapping his name on it after it died) and let that info fly out into the media. That's what's happening here.
|