| Posted: 06 October 2008 at 10:53pm | IP Logged | 9
|
|
|
Yeah, that's an opinon piece that makes a lot of claims and doesn't back any of them up.
It's like Sean Hannity, but written instead of spoken.
The author's biggest gripe is that Obama and Ayers "pushed a radical agenda" on the schools, but how so? It's just vague generalities - including, laughably, among other, the fact "that teachers should be community organizers dedicated to provoking resistance to American racism and oppression"
So... resistance to racism is radical? No wonder there was so much confusion a page or two ago.
He then tries to tie Obama and Ayers as close, claiming to use meeting notes and records, but... then doesn't give any examples. He instead notes that Ayers was on a board of directors, so therefore must've had some say in approving Obama's position in the organization.
Um...
Yeah, that's a pretty poorly written attack, that one is...
|