"I saw Ventura saying he was supportive of more investigation on that, because he was too intrigued about the way the 3rd tower fell."

Anything strange about such an incident should of course be investigated. The problem isn't that the questions are asked, but that they are asked, answered in excruciating detail with scientific reports, witness statements, reconstructions etc. and some guys decide that the answers aren't good enough because they don't believe the science.

A lot of conspiracy theories depend on the theorist's "personal science" or "personal laws of physics". 

In real life, weird things happen. And when weird things happen you're going to have dozens, sometimes even hundreds of reputable experts and scientists, leaders in the field, going over that data with a fine tooth comb on their spare time trying to find the explanation. Because that information can help them understand their own work better.

Conspiracy theorists like to parade around the conceit that no-one but they had the courage or curiosity required to look into this and find the answers. The truth is usually that lots of more qualified people looked into it, found out what happened and concluded that there was nothing hinky going on. But that's not nearly as interesting.

www.loosechage911.com

www.zeitgeistmovie.com

Loose change brings up some disturbing questions about Building 7.  Otherwise, there are problems with their thesis.

Zeitgeist's first 20 min or so are an awesome historical look at faith, and not for sensitve religious types.  Also?  NSFW

Scott as a democrat during the primary I supported Obama with the same, if not more, passion you had for Hillary. If Hillary would have been the democrats choice, I would have put my support behind Hillary, because Hillary and Obama's platforms are almost the same. You have attacked Obama and his wife with such venom I could not figure out where it was coming from.

You say get a grip I say get a clue and realize how you are coming across.

Jodi Moisan wrote: No someone who links a thing pointing out that black people are only voting for Obama because he is black, is insulting.  But the Howard Stern show is a perfect place to get fair and balanced reporting.

Did you listen to it at all, Jodi?  It certainly didn't paint all blacks voting for Obama only because he is black himself.  It was a humorous piece about how people really don't know the issues and are voting for the person they like.  Was it done with all races, creeds, and colors across the breadth and depth of NYC?  No, but that doesn't make it any less telling that some people will vote for someone for whatever reason and often it comes down to not knowing or caring about what it is they stand for.  I certainly didn't take this Stern piece as indicative of every black person in the country nor did I take Scott posting it as some sort of racial slam because he himself has a problem with blacks.  There was nothing different about this than what I've seen numerous times on The Daily Show.