Posted: 30 June 2025 at 8:20pm | IP Logged | 1
|
post reply
|
|
Rereading the Romita (Sr.) run on The Amazing Spider-man this summer, I'm reminded of the confusion I felt in the mid 80s as a brand new comic book reader--namely that the Spider-man I was reading about off the spinner rack was noticeably stronger than the Spider-man I was reading about in the Marvel Tales back issues I was finding at garage sales and flee markets. In those days, it seemed obvious to me that he must have been pulling his punches when fighting the gangsters and bank robbers he so often fought in the early issues, but I had a hard time, initially, wrapping my head around those very same gangsters and bank robbers knocking him out cold when I had just seen him go toe-to-toe with a super powered enemy in a comic bought off the spinner rack. Of course it didn't take long, even as a twelve-year-old, to realize that he was depicted, for whatever reason, as more powerful as time passed, and it was as simple as that. But that brings me back to my question...do you prefer the Spider-man who could get knocked out by a non-powered gangster, or the Spider-man who could defeat the X-Men (for example). And why?
|