Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 39 Next >>
Topic: Kamala Harris Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Dave Kopperman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 December 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3368
Posted: 20 September 2024 at 4:44pm | IP Logged | 1 post reply

So what should the cuts target, then?
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Steven Queen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 February 2020
Location: United States
Posts: 946
Posted: 20 September 2024 at 5:55pm | IP Logged | 2 post reply

Eliminate deficient spending (i.e. spending more that you take in).  This is at the heart of the Fed's money-printing machine thinking.

In FY 2023 total government spending was $6.13 trillion and total revenue was $4.44 trillion, resulting in a deficit of $1.70 trillion, an increase of $320 billion from the previous fiscal year.

I have many places in mind where we are spending uselessly, but to give voice to them here would incite a dog-pile of counter-opinions (I think) and be choked full of my personal biases of what (as an engineer) is critical and what is "fluff" that the government should not be doing.  I'm impressed and like Argentina's Milei who is unabashedly a libertarian radical (I am not) fighting against a century of socialism corruption.  But it may surprise you that I think our intelligence agencies (as proxies for the DoD and State Dept) have run amok trying to have "full spectrum dominance" across the world.  We are a country with 4% of the world population trying to control everything everywhere.  I hate the neocons (e.g. Chaney who currently is endorsing Harris).

How about an across-the-board percentage-reduction of departments until we are within say 110% of revenues? (not 138%)  Let the individual departments themselves decide what is essential and what is fat.

That doesn't address the debt at all (need budget surpluses or other fiscal tricks), but it would be an amazing start.   Let's be honest.  We are not at war.  There are no global emergencies (except the ones we are fabricating).  It's time to get the house in order and stockpile some reserves for future hardships.


Edited by Steven Queen on 20 September 2024 at 6:01pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Steven Queen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 February 2020
Location: United States
Posts: 946
Posted: 20 September 2024 at 5:59pm | IP Logged | 3 post reply

There's also dark money: i.e. funds for secret programs that even Congress is not allowed to know how much it is because that might allow someone to infer what's being done with it.

Talk about utterly unchecked power!  With all this secrecy and government incited censorship, how are the citizen of a free nation suppose to make informed choices? 

"By the People" indeed!


Edited by Steven Queen on 20 September 2024 at 6:03pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Andrew Davey
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1445
Posted: 20 September 2024 at 6:13pm | IP Logged | 4 post reply

How to fix the Debt (a modest proposal)

Step 1 - Congress delegates the power of setting tax rates to an independent body.
Step 2 - Independent body is made up of accountants, actuaries, and economists.
Step 3 - Independent body devises the mathematical calculation for tax rates. Within a certain level of GDP deficit on a net present value factor. Tax rates are automated. Some consideration for the economic cycle, rates auto lower during recession and rise during recoveries. Providing an auto gas/brake as needed without political interference.
Step 4 - Congress argues and passes the bills on how to spend the money for the country for what is important. Guns vs butter. If they spend to much, we, the current taxpayers begin to feel the pain now and can vote accordingly. Future generations will not feel the brunt of our lack of responsibility for our actions.
Step 5 - Congress is held accountable on a semi-real time basis (every 2 years) by the voters for the choices they make. You can't spend and not tax. You must debate what is important to the majority of the people. Debate and compromise,
Step 6 - Problem solved Utopia breaks out.
Step 7 - Constant review of the process to make sure no one is gaming the system. New problem found? Repeat fix.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Steven Queen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 February 2020
Location: United States
Posts: 946
Posted: 20 September 2024 at 6:19pm | IP Logged | 5 post reply

 Peter Martin wrote:
I think most metrics do not agree we have never recovered from the recession of 2008 though.

For example, the level of the stock market and the size of GDP. Both have grown at stunning rates over the last 15 years.


On GDP growth, not "stunning" but normal.  Here's the inflation adjusted graph (also adjusted by population)



You can see that once you take inflation and population growth out, it's pretty linear.

However, it's even worse than you might guess since Federal spending is part of GDP and we know that has greatly increased, especially in the last 8 years.  In fact, once nearly 1 million jobs were quietly adjusted out of the last year's inflated monthly reports --- almost all the remaining jobs added were federal.

However, that does not disprove what you are saying about recovery.  By those metrics the financial markets have.  There are other indicators I could dig for, but it would be an effort.



Edited by Steven Queen on 20 September 2024 at 8:32pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Steven Queen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 February 2020
Location: United States
Posts: 946
Posted: 20 September 2024 at 6:22pm | IP Logged | 6 post reply

Not bad Andrew!  Have you heard Warren Buffet's solution? 

“I could end the deficit in five minutes. You just pass a law that says that anytime there is a deficit of more than 3% of GDP all sitting members of congress are ineligible for reelection.”
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mark Haslett
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 6440
Posted: 20 September 2024 at 7:02pm | IP Logged | 7 post reply

Steven: There are no global emergencies (except the ones we are fabricating).

**
Is this what the most current science tells us? What is the difference between a global emergency and a "fabricated" global emergency?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Peter Martin
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 March 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 15961
Posted: 20 September 2024 at 7:41pm | IP Logged | 8 post reply

 Steven Queen wrote:
You can see that once you take inflation and population growth out, it's pretty linear.

Which is a strong performance. As steep as the boom years in the 80s. As steep as post-war years. Much, much stronger than the 1970s.

As for Nonfarm payrolls being adjusted.... There is nothing untoward in this. Measuring real world data is always subject to revisions. The BLS adjusts NFPs on a monthly basis anyway, and every report always has an adjustment for the previous couple of months. The most inflated thing I see is your description that it was revised down by nearly 1 million. It was revised down by 818k. And that revision meant the jobs market was merely strong by historical standards rather than super-tight as previously thought. The number will be revised again in February 2025. Each revision is just giving us a better picture of the past.

By the by, the most recent nonfarm payrolls (for August) showed jobs growth of 142,000, which is indicative of a growing economy. This report is basically the most up-to-date proxy for GDP performance and I therefore do not see the evidence for your claim that the economy is in recession. The data simply does not back this claim up.


Edited by Peter Martin on 20 September 2024 at 7:41pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Steven Queen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 February 2020
Location: United States
Posts: 946
Posted: 20 September 2024 at 8:03pm | IP Logged | 9 post reply

Mark:  You invoked "science", so I am thinking you mean either pandemics or climate change.  Both are massive rabbit holes and I imagine I don't hold the same beliefs you do on those topics.  

I tried very hard to research climate change in order to give an informed and unbiased opinion to my sister-in-law---I even know a little bit about the composition of the atmosphere and radiometry because of work.  In the process of trying to understand the "science" I got called nasty names by both sides of that debate on social media.  I've read the IPCC and some academic papers.  My conclusion after about 4 months zooming in on the micro topic as to whether CO2 via the greenhouse effect is driving a temperature increase: there is no consensus.  I cannot say scientifically what is correct.  There are proven instances of historical data tampering, contrary opinion suppression, and a whole lot of half-truths being told because there's a lot of money at stake.

I have, however, formed a biased opinion based on who has lied in the past and who has a profit motive in order to jump to a personal conclusion, and it's that there is a con-game for profit and control being run using climate change as a fabricated crisis.  I feel it's extremely unlikely man-made CO2 controls planetary temperature, and methane even less so.  Climate does change, and mankind's actions have an impact on the environment...but the counting carbon thing seems a nefarious BS metric.

At this point I am not sure anyone can know the answer (and the whole-Earth climate models for this are quite crude).  All of the predictive models (and there are dozens of named ones) have been wrong for the past 25 years---EXCEPT THE RUSSIAN ONE WHICH IGNORES CO2's greenhouse effect!?!  This chaos is getting amplified over time because fewer and fewer climate "scientists" have any background in physics and are coming at it from the angle of "public policy degree" etc.

Does that help you mentally pigeon-hole me as a total nutjob?  Well, whatever you make think of me, I really do just want to know the truth, and in this case I could not definitively find it so I had to go with my gut. (Puts tinfoil hat back on head.)

Bottom line is: Do you think if your government taxes the hell out of you it's really going to help control the weather?


Edited by Steven Queen on 20 September 2024 at 8:53pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Steven Queen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 February 2020
Location: United States
Posts: 946
Posted: 20 September 2024 at 8:25pm | IP Logged | 10 post reply

Peter:  Sure, if you want to call typical, "strong". I think what's most surprising is how little influence politicians and fiscal policy have had on the real GDP grow.  Only a few dips jump out: 1970s, 2009 and COVID.  It irks me to give any credit to the Federal Reserve but what is actually driving it?  Weird.

Here's a short video on one recession metric and mentions the others he has previously covered:

EDIT:  Another recent indicator (bankruptcies up 63%)
and another (consumer debt)


Edited by Steven Queen on 25 September 2024 at 12:50pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Dave Kopperman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 December 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3368
Posted: 20 September 2024 at 8:48pm | IP Logged | 11 post reply

I feel like there needs to be a Libertarian thread for all of this.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Tim O Neill
Byrne Robotics Security


Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10940
Posted: 20 September 2024 at 8:52pm | IP Logged | 12 post reply



Steven, are you going to vote for Trump now that your candidate RFK Jr has
joined his campaign?




Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 39 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login