Posted: 03 July 2025 at 9:55am | IP Logged | 7
|
post reply
|
|
I liked a lot Jim Shooter both as a writer and as EIC, and if as a writer i saw him capable of the best (the first Secret Wars series, Daredevil, many of his Avengers stories, Solar, Harbinger, etc.) and the worst (Secret Wars II) i understand that was also true as EIC.
He isn't the only reason why the comics of the late 70s and 80s, particularly at Marvel, had a litterary dimension, some of it came as natural developpement from the work of Stan Lee, Jack Kirby, Steve Ditko, Roy Thomas and others, some from the approach of Denny O'Neil and Steve Gerber... that was here before Shooter. But Jim Shooter favored and amplified the phenomena, made it an ambition, an objective. He had the chance that Marvel got the writers and artists with the talent to fullfill it. Some were already there, he gave their first chance to others. Together they built the Marvel of the 80s we loved, second in creativity to the 60s, taking the best of the maturity that was sometime there in the late 60s and 70s, generalising, expanding it while keeping the books fresh and all-age: it was aimed at young teen, fun for kids and had qualities that could interest adults.
John Romita, the elder one, said that Shooter was great at first, for maybe three years ; but after the huge success of Secret Wars, thought he knew everything. That was probably more than three years, yet it seems to be a pertinent remark (at least to me who wasn't there, otherwise than as a reader of the books.)
JB says what he always said on this board, and share his personnal experience as a creator and a direct witness ; his sincerity is compatible with the respect due to Jim, both as a man, an artist, a pro and a defunct.
I had a few exchanges with Jim on his blog during the months, about a year overall, when he wrote it in the mid-2010s, he always was very nice to me and other fans.
Edited by Stéphane Garrelie on 03 July 2025 at 10:43am
|