Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 2
Topic: Is DC on the road back to the 70’s? (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Paul Kimball
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 September 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2026
Posted: 21 May 2007 at 9:09pm | IP Logged | 1  

It's a fictional universe either way. I would guess good writers could write
appealing stories in either setting, but I prefer the concept of the multiverse
myself, so no complaints whether it started 25 or 125 years ago.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Imaginary X-Man

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 127994
Posted: 22 May 2007 at 5:02am | IP Logged | 2  

Marvel of the 70s, perhaps.

+++

How so?

****

Not so long ago I sat with increasing bogglement, listening to one of the Higher Ups at DC describe the plans for the next couple of years --- using Marvel titles as the "shorthand". "This will be our Kree-Skrull War, and this will be our Secret Wars, and this will be our "all-new, all-different"…" The only DC project referred to was the 20 year old CRISIS ON INFINITE EARTHS.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Scott Richards
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2005
Posts: 1258
Posted: 22 May 2007 at 6:06am | IP Logged | 3  

If Marvel set things back to the way they were in the 70s I might actually be buying more than 2 Marvel books right now.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mark Spiridakis
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 March 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 176
Posted: 22 May 2007 at 10:38am | IP Logged | 4  

 Michael Connell wrote:
I've noticed on my DC site the younger readers seem to be complaining that DC is starting to cater to our generation "The old guys" with the return of the Multiverse, Hal Jordan back as GL and the new JLA.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion. But this is like saying keeping Clark Kent as Superman "caters" to the readers of the thirties and early forties.

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Imaginary X-Man

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 127994
Posted: 22 May 2007 at 10:43am | IP Logged | 5  

But this is like saying keeping Clark Kent as Superman "caters" to the readers of the thirties and early forties.

***

Quite the contrary. That's merely following continuity. But 20 years ago DC deliberately broke continuity, with CRISIS, MAN OF STEEL, George's WONDER WOMAN reboot, etc. To harken back to the pre-CRISIS days is to play to exactly what I find most wrong with DC these days -- their idea of "innovation" is to press REWIND. And that is most definitely catering to the "old" crowd.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Zaki Hasan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 8105
Posted: 22 May 2007 at 11:29am | IP Logged | 6  

To harken back to the pre-CRISIS days is to play to exactly what I find most wrong with DC these days -- their idea of "innovation" is to press REWIND. And that is most definitely catering to the "old" crowd.

*****

Agree with this 150%.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Kurt Anderson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 18 November 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 2035
Posted: 22 May 2007 at 12:50pm | IP Logged | 7  

I applaud DC for catering to me.  Unfortunately about 80% of their books are still aimed at other readers.  They need to fix that.

I hope that "going back to the 70's" includes bringing back all of those war, romance, and horror titles.  And the oversized editions too.

 

 



Edited by Kurt Anderson on 22 May 2007 at 12:51pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Ed Love
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 October 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 2711
Posted: 22 May 2007 at 1:06pm | IP Logged | 8  

If only they were trying to re-wind. Everything out of DC the past few
years has struck me more looking at the past and then taking everything
that was complained about or viewed as wrong and amping that up. The
90's saw brief replacements of Wonder Woman, Superman, Batman as
heroes and longer replacement of Hal Jordan. So, now we kill off and
incapacitate even more heroes and replace them with kewler more PC
versions. Crisis on Infinite Earths? Countdown to Infinite Crisis which led
to mini's that didn't resolve anything that led to Infinite Crisis that had to
be tiedied up by 52 which no sooner ended than they started up
Countdown...

Multiple Earths was too confusing when each Earth's continuity had very
little duplication? Now we have multiple Earths with a JSA on the primary
universe that remembers 2 sets of lives as well as a JSA-Earth, 2 sets of
Marvel families with different histories, 2 groups of Freedom Fighters, 2
groups of heroes from Charlton, etc. They aren't supposed to be the same
as the ones from pre-Crisis, then why pretty much duplicate those
Earths? Why retread the old ground if all you're going to do is muddy
things even more?
Back to Top profile | search | www
 

Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.

<< Prev Page of 2
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login