Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 27 Next >>
Topic: Donald Trump (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Trevor Smith
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 September 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 3522
Posted: 31 August 2015 at 12:44pm | IP Logged | 1  

I am not a number, I am a free man! (Yes, I know what
the "#" is)
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
John Young
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 August 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3145
Posted: 31 August 2015 at 1:06pm | IP Logged | 2  

You are #6, Who is #1.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Dave Phelps
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4180
Posted: 31 August 2015 at 5:23pm | IP Logged | 3  

 Kevin Hagerman wrote:
I just don't want four to eight more years of Republicans losing their shit over every goddamn thing the president does.


You'd get that no matter which Democrat wins. Hilary takes a lot of shots now because she's the presumptive nominee, but a President Sanders wouldn't have an easier time of it.

The problem is that supporting a political opponent and their policies (even when it's something you'd been pitching for before they agreed with you) is seen as a losing strategy. It can only help them get re-elected while hurting your chances in the next Primary.

"He does a good job, but I think it could be done better" isn't nearly as compelling as "he's trying to destroy our country!!!!!!" I guess.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Vinny Valenti
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 8053
Posted: 31 August 2015 at 6:10pm | IP Logged | 4  

"I don't see the contradiction"

--

Why bend over backwards to ensure that Bin Laden's body is disposed of in an offical Islam-approved manner if he wasn't a true Muslim?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Wilson Mui
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4528
Posted: 31 August 2015 at 6:32pm | IP Logged | 5  

I think the government did it, so the Muslim world wouldn't be upset.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Roberts
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 14821
Posted: 31 August 2015 at 6:55pm | IP Logged | 6  

Why bend over backwards to ensure that Bin Laden's body is disposed
of in an offical Islam-approved manner if he wasn't a true Muslim?

----

Because whether or not Obama, the government or whoever
considered bin Laden not a true Muslim, Muslims would see it as
disrespecting Islam if he were buried inappropriately. Why should the
government feed the Al-Qaeda propaganda machine?

And how exactly was the government "bending over backwards"? The
procedures were no more onerous than any other funeral rites.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Kevin Hagerman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 April 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 17997
Posted: 31 August 2015 at 7:16pm | IP Logged | 7  

We've see this time and time again where ISIS, or domestic terrorist like Nidal Hasan and the Tsarnaev Brothers, claim they are doing what they do in large part for religious reasons, only to have the administration and news media dismiss it. Why?

--------------

The KKK consider themselves reg'lar Christian folk, but I have yet to see a Christian called on the carpet like I have the whole goddamn Muslim world over terrorism.

*****

We're never going to understand, let alone defeat, this enemy by ignoring their stated motivations.
----------

That is a point worth considering, but writing it off as Islam is reductive.  It does the opposite.  "No, they aren't mad because we've been pissing in their yard for two generations; it's just that they're towelheads."

Back to Top profile | search
 
Glen Keith
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 July 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 851
Posted: 01 September 2015 at 3:03am | IP Logged | 8  

Acknowledging ISIS core beliefs isn't the same as saying, "they're mad because they're Muslims." However, ignoring or dismissing that aspect makes it impossible to truly comprehend why they are doing what they're doing. You wouldn't be able to understand the likes of the Westboro Baptist Church by only looking at their secular motivations, and taking into account their religious motivations doesn't mean that all Christians must answer for them. Oh, sure, there may be some who will happily assume that all Muslims are mad, but they won't understand ISIS anymore than those who claim that it's all about borders drawn up in 1919. All the puzzle pieces are important and removing one, for whatever reason, yields an incomplete picture.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Vinny Valenti
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 8053
Posted: 01 September 2015 at 9:26am | IP Logged | 9  

"Muslims would see it as disrespecting Islam if he were buried inappropriately. Why should the government feed the Al-Qaeda propaganda machine?"

---

We fed the machine by invading Pakistan and killing Bin Laden in the first place. I don't think the body disposal method would really sway a potential Al Qaeda recruit.

And I can't see how the non-radical Muslim community at large would feel disrespected over what we do with the remains of a man that they felt perverted the teachings of their religion, anyway.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Roberts
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 14821
Posted: 01 September 2015 at 9:58am | IP Logged | 10  

And I can't see how the non-radical Muslim community at large would
feel disrespected over what we do with the remains of a man that they
felt perverted the teachings of their religion, anyway.

-----

Of course you can't.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Penn
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 April 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 12466
Posted: 01 September 2015 at 10:12am | IP Logged | 11  

And I can't see how the non-radical Muslim community at large would feel disrespected over what we do with the remains of a man that they felt perverted the teachings of their religion, anyway.

***

As a matter of strict logic, I understand what you're saying, Vinny. But as a matter of realpolitik, not to mention dealing with the rational and even irrational passions that religion arouses, don't you think that de rigueur superficial "respect" was the best choice?
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Bodin
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
Purveyor of Rare Items

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3911
Posted: 01 September 2015 at 11:14am | IP Logged | 12  

To get back on the topic of Donald Trump, I found this interesting:

Link:  http://nypost.com/2015/08/29/pendulum-factor-could-land-trum p-in-white-house/

Interesting points to ponder (not saying anything one way or the other about Trump as a Presidential hopeful, just regarding the "pendulum factor" impact on past elections, as they've analyzed things in the article).

[edited for typo]


Edited by John Bodin on 01 September 2015 at 11:15am
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 

<< Prev Page of 27 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login