Just Advil Cold & Sinus. I rarely take medication, so I think my bodie's having a hard time adjusting.

I bought it from the cleanest looking hobo on my corner, he has a spectacularly toothy grin. After verifying his credentials on Wikipedia, I sealed the deal.

David, that sentence reads fine to me. It seems to be one of the only things in the entry that does read correct in some fashion. I would agree from what I know that in his professional life, JB's life has been dominated by American super-heroes.

Now, if you think of that in a leather and whips, submissive sort of way... That's another matter entirely that I have no authority to speak on.

Fun with disinformation, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_Byrne

I've edited the Legend imprint info to remove references to Byrne creating it with Miller. I've read an interview with Mignola[1] where he mentions he brought Byrne into it, so I think it's disputable he created the imprint.

That change is certainly correct; Byrne wasn't one of the initial movers behind Legend. Legend didn't even exist when Byrne began Next Men -- assuming the cover stats at Byrne's site are accurate, the logo didn't even appear until JBNM 19. So I've fixed the paragraph up a little, since it implies all Byrne's DH work was published as Legend. N. Caligon 16:29, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Or...

II remember from the time that Byrne left FF because the powers that be wanted The Thing back in the book in time for the 25th anniversary, #296(?), and Byrne refused and left the book halfway through a storyline. But I can't cite source, it's just my memory. Anyone else recall this? Steve block 06:43, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Or...

I can back up Legend was Byrne's proposal. If you accept my memory as source. I'll try and cite a better one at some point. Steve block 17:13, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Or....

No, plain facial features as opposed to detailed features. You can compare this. I'm going to reference Understanding Comics and try to revise this, but there are ways of measuring this stuff, it's not all "in the eye of the beholder". --JRT 14:26, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

It's like a parade of retards, and when I say that, I realize that I'm insulting retarded people everywhere by making the comparison. And it's all right there, for anyone that wants to 'know' about JB. You seriously don't see problems with that on a supposed 'factual' source?