Posted: 12 January 2006 at 8:39am | IP Logged | 11
|
|
|
"Southern pride" may be blinding you to the economic realities. In the changing world of the late 19th Century, the slave holding Confederacy would have plunged deeper and deeper into economic decline. By the turn of that century, the CSA would have been a "third world" nation that would have made modern India look like an industrial paradise. The CSA would have been faced with some very harsh choices -- basically boiling down to rejoining the Union, or starving to death.
********************************************
I used to think that if the South had won (defined, I suppose, by the South maintaining its indepedence) that it would have been easy pickings for another country -- England, even France. Do you see that as a possibility? Or if another country had tried to "take" the South, that the Union would have intervened?
************************
Spike Lee thinks a minstrel show would be a huge success in a White market. What more do you need to know about his stance on these matters?
**********************************
Well, there is the UPN.
Seriously, though, I think one of the greatest examples of how "diversity" can often equal divisiveness is that twenty years ago, the number on TV show in the U.S. (and none of the 18-49 stuff -- purely based on numbers) was Cosby, a show with a predominately black cast with a genuinely black POV (not oppressivly so, either). And everyone watched it.
Now, the viewing habits of blacks and whites (generically speaking) is really splintered. UPN is basically a programming ghetto. What changed?
Grey's Anatomy has an honest diversity that's refreshing and is fun to watch, though, but it's a rarity.
|