Posted: 13 January 2006 at 10:39am | IP Logged | 7
|
|
|
Leroy wrote:
...Because anyone who has (and on this board, that's probably just me and one or two lurkers)... |
|
|
That's an unfair statement. One that, ironically, given the subject, paints most of us with the same brush.
For the record, I have seen "Bamboozled." I understand Spike Lee's intent, and the film is interesting. I don't think it's one of his best works, frankly. And, again touching on the subject of irony, the montage of old film clips takes some things out of context to prove a point.
Case in point: A clip shows Stymie of "Our Gang" walking into a classroom wearing man-sized clothes. Well, Lee didn't show that Wheezer and Deborah, Stymie's young friends were also wearing parts of a man's outfit. You see, the small children found some clothes belonging to the brother of their teacher, Miss Crabtree. Her brother had went for a swim, skinny-dipping, and some of the older children stole his clothes and hid them. The younger children discovered the man's clothes and walk into the class, each wearing a different article of the clothing, showing what they had found to the teacher.
The clip, out of context, is suppose to show that Stymie is being portrayed in a clownish manner, I suppose. Why else is that clip there, I wondered? Stymie, as a character, as much as any black child in the "Our Gang" shorts, were mostly shown as equals with the white kids. I can't say that there was never any jokes based on race in the twenty-plus years of the series (It was still a product of its' time), but it was ahead of its' time on its' portrayal of race relations.
Spike Lee is a talented director. I usually enjoy his visual style, though it seemed to be missing some punch in "Bamboozled." I also thought that film was heavy-handed, but I think it's worth watching at least once.
|